finweek

Tax base: from the right pocket to the left

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Pieter Janse van Rensburg is a director at AJM Tax and a non-practising advocate of the High Court and Chartered Accountant (SA)
Pieter Janse van Rensburg is a director at AJM Tax and a non-practising advocate of the High Court and Chartered Accountant (SA)

The National Treasury has looked to amend three areas in our income tax legislation to provide fiscal space. How does this affect your company?


During the February 2021 Budget Speech, then Finance Minister Tito Mboweni made the exciting announcement to the approximately 2.5m corporate taxpayers that the corporate tax rate for tax years of assessment commencing on or after 1 April 2022 will be decreased from the current 28% to 27%. Apart from accountants likely to adjust deferred tax balances for companies, the first real impact of the rate reduction will be seen in the 2023 calendar year.

Without a substantial windfall to the fiscus that can absorb the loss from the rate reduction, the National Treasury has looked to amend three areas in our income tax legislation to provide some fiscal space. Cognisance must be taken of those now.

Restricting the set-off of balances of assessed loss for companies

In determining taxable income, taxpayers are currently allowed to set off their balance of assessed losses carried forward from the preceding tax year against their income. An unutilised assessed loss balance may be carried forward to future years of assessment to be set off against future income (provided that the taxpayer’s trade continues without interruption).

While such restrictions on the utilisation of balances of assessed losses are often imposed on a time-based methodology (particularly in Africa), National Treasury has decided to instead look at a value restriction.

Currently, government proposes restricting the offset of the balance of assessed losses carried forward to 80% of taxable income without forfeiting the amount of loss carried forward.

The effect of the proposed restriction is that only companies that would be in a positive taxable income position before setting off the balance of assessed losses would be affected. This approach is viewed as reasonable and one that affects all businesses more equally, rather than restricting the number of years for carrying forward assessed losses, which would disproportionately hurt businesses with large initial investments or long lead times to profitability. The proposed amendment is expected to affect (initially, at least) approximately 200 000 corporate taxpayers in South Africa. 

How does this affect your company, and what should you do? As a starting point, if your company is in a loss position, ensure that those losses have, in fact, been crystallised through income tax assessments with the SA Revenue Service (Sars). How the proposed loss-restriction regime will impact your company’s future tax position is directly related to its balance of assessed loss carried forward: engage with your tax practitioner and ensure that your filings are up to date. Significant share transactions for companies in assessed loss positions exceeding R50m are specifically reportable to Sars, with defaults resulting in the imposition of penalties up to R3.6m.

Secondly, if practical and commercially feasible, consider the timing of entering into projects and agreements and aim to utilise losses as quickly as possible. Each year of assessment that a portion of the loss is carried forward to a subsequent year makes the loss less valuable, given the time value of money.

Discontinuing incentives

The government is systematically reviewing all business tax incentives in order to repeal those that are redundant, inefficient or inequitable. During 2020, sunset clauses were included with various incentives that previously had no end dates. Incentives and allowances that have been (or soon to be) on the chopping block are 12J (venture capital companies), 12F (airports and port assets), 12DA (rolling stock), 13sept (low cost residential) and 12O (films). All other incentives are currently in review and capitalising on available ones could provide for a welcome windfall.

What is still available to capitalise on? While the section 11D research and development incentive appears to be safe for now, government called for comments on a discussion paper earlier in the year, which will be considered by the National Treasury and the Department of Science and Innovation during 2021 to determine its efficacy.

Although not yet promulgated, the section 13quat urban development incentive has been extended until 31 March 2023, but this appears only to be the case since government needs more time to review its effectiveness in achieving its objectives to be conducted – this one appears to be headed to the history books soon.

To encourage skills development and job creation, the learnership tax incentive in section 12H provides employers with an additional tax deduction over and above the normal remuneration that can be deducted. Also not yet promulgated, the extension of this incentive (one of the oldest and most used) until 1 April 2024 seems likely.

Interest deductibility

The main aim of these rules is to limit excessive interest deductions in respect of debts owed to persons not subject to tax in SA. Areas of the proposed amendment include the formulas that quantify deductions to be made and what constitutes “interest”. Any companies with cross-border interest should be aware of the proposed amendments, which have been debated in Parliament on 6 September 2021, and which should be finalised during November 2021. 

Without significant economic growth to increase activity, employment and bringing more persons (natural or corporate) into the tax base, it appears as though government has very little fiscal space to reduce the corporate tax rate without cutting back on other favourable regimes. It really seems to be a case of “from the right pocket to the left”, and one cannot help but wonder if the limited resources available in government should rather be deployed to areas such as the ease of doing business in an over-regulated private sector and stimulating the economy.

Read more
This article was written exclusively for finweek's 23 September newsletter. You can subscribe to the weekly newsletter here.
finweek


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
14.45
+0.8%
Rand - Pound
19.96
+0.6%
Rand - Euro
16.82
+0.7%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.85
+0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.8%
Gold
1,781.92
+0.7%
Silver
24.31
+2.7%
Palladium
2,073.50
-1.4%
Platinum
1,054.00
+1.1%
Brent Crude
85.08
+0.9%
Top 40
60,348
+0.3%
All Share
66,895
+0.2%
Resource 10
63,203
-0.1%
Industrial 25
85,486
+0.6%
Financial 15
14,008
-0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Facebook is facing a fresh crisis after a former employee turned whistle-blower leaked internal company research . Do you still use Facebook?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the benefits outweigh the risk for me
23% - 159 votes
No, I have deleted it
47% - 329 votes
Yes, but I am considering deleting it
30% - 206 votes
Vote