OPINION | 10 reasons why the Expropriation Bill is potentially unconstitutional

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The Expropriation Bill goes beyond the ambit of the Constitutional property clause, say the writers.
The Expropriation Bill goes beyond the ambit of the Constitutional property clause, say the writers.
iStock

The Expropriation Bill goes beyond the ambit of the constitutional property clause and permits nil compensation in certain circumstances, deviating from the compensation-based nature of the Constitution, say Bulelwa Mabasa and Thomas Karberg. 

South Africans have recently been presented with the Expropriation Bill B3-2020 ("the Bill"). While it has drawn vociferous criticism from various voices, it is crucial to view the bill in the broader context of the land reform project. In our view, a unified system of expropriation and compensation is to be welcomed, as the compensation mechanisms in the Expropriation Act No. 63 of 1975 ("the 1975 Act") and the Constitution have been inconsistent since the inception of the Constitution.

Support independent journalism
Subscribe to News24 for just R75 per month to read all our investigative and in-depth journalism. You can cancel any time.
Subscribe
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Rand - Dollar
14.97
-0.9%
Rand - Pound
20.59
-0.7%
Rand - Euro
17.37
-1.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.23
-1.1%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-1.3%
Gold
1,789.18
-0.3%
Silver
24.06
-0.7%
Palladium
1,979.50
-1.5%
Platinum
1,026.11
-0.5%
Brent Crude
86.40
+0.5%
Top 40
60,797
-0.3%
All Share
67,494
-0.2%
Resource 10
63,048
-0.6%
Industrial 25
87,148
-0.1%
Financial 15
14,043
+0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Facebook is facing a fresh crisis after a former employee turned whistle-blower leaked internal company research . Do you still use Facebook?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the benefits outweigh the risk for me
26% - 342 votes
No, I have deleted it
44% - 577 votes
Yes, but I am considering deleting it
29% - 384 votes
Vote