Sassa seeks ConCourt to overturn ruling on Net 1


Cape Town - The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) will ask the Constitutional Court to allow it to extend a welfare distribution contract with Net 1 UEPS Technologies’ Cash Paymaster Services unit, which the nation’s top court had ruled invalid, to ensure that 17.2 million people continue being paid.

The payments, which amount to R139.5bn a year, are a signature policy of the ruling African National Congress, which says the grants are an important measure to reduce inequality. In previous election campaigns its officials have told rallies that if another party came to power the payments may end.

While Net 1’s contract expires at the end of March, Sassa hasn’t appointed a replacement or made arrangements to take over the payments itself. Although six options, including using other banks, were considered, granting Net 1 a one-year extension was considered the only viable one, Sassa executive manager Raphaahle Ramokgopa told Parliament on Wednesday. The agency is effectively asking the nation’s highest court to overturn its own ruling. Net 1 shares surged.

“The only thing that would make us survive is to go to court and ask for the suspension of the invalidity” of Net 1’s contract, she said. Any other option “will not enable Sassa to pay on April 1, 2017.”

If the court refuses to allow the extension support for the ANC may be damaged.

Welfare grants are “possibly one of the most important instruments available to the ANC and to the government in order to mobilise support,” Dirk Kotze, a politics professor at the University of South Africa, said in an interview from Pretoria. “If there were interruptions for a month or so, the ANC would be regarded as the one who should take responsibility for it. A huge percentage of the South African population would be affected.”

Forced emergency

ANC legislators welcomed the approach taken by Sassa, saying it would ensure welfare payments will continue in April. Opposition parties criticised Sassa for not having an alternate plan should the court refuse to sanction the extension of Net 1’s contract and alleged that it had been politically pressured to retain the company’s services.

“The Constitutional Court may have no option but to condone the extension of Net 1’s existing illegal contract to ensure the payment of welfare grants isn’t interrupted,” said Lindy Wilson, the DA’s shadow deputy minister for social development. “They have done nothing for two years to force this emergency.”

Thokozani Magwaza, the welfare agency’s chief executive officer, denied that the agency had tried to circumvent the court order, saying its attempts to issue a new tender were upended when two potential bidders withdrew and none of the others met the technical specifications.

‘No pressure’

“It’s not like we have been sitting on our laurels,” he said. “The fact remains that a decision needs to be taken. Come April 1 we need to pay. We have not had any political pressure on the issue of CPS,” he said after allegations of interference were made by opposition parties.

Ramokgopa said Sassa will use the extension of Net 1’s contract to give it time to issue a closed tender to 27 banks to take over the payments for welfare recipients that have accounts and appoint a new company to distribute cash to those that don’t. The agency ultimately aims to take over the entire payments system itself. The tender will be issued by the end of March and banks will be required to express their interest in May with contracting expected in June.

Funeral insurance

Sassa want the banks to offer accounts designed to protect welfare recipients, often poor rural citizens with little understanding of how financial systems work, from companies that offer services such as funeral insurance for children and mobile-phone airtime and then make deductions directly from state payments.

The Constitutional Court ruled the Net 1 contract invalid in 2013 because of the way it was awarded a year earlier. Net 1’s chief executive officer, Serge Belamant, said on Tuesday his company is willing to keep providing the service and would also consider selling the unit that handles the payment to the South African government. Belamant wasn’t immediately available to comment on Wednesday.

Net 1 has been in legal battles with the government over the right to allow deductions and it part owns some companies that offer the services.

“Up to now, CPS have been doing a good job with regard to the payments of grants,” which must be separated from the issue of the deductions, Magwaza said. “I have got to divorce the two things. CPS is not deducting per se, Net 1 is one that is doing the deductions. It’s unfortunate they are in the same stable.”

‘Upper hand’

Net 1 shares rose as much as 11% to $12.74 in New York and traded at $12.63 as of 12: 25 local time.

"It’s a great result for South Africa,” Belamant said in an interview on Wednesday. “This is probably the best system in the world. The question is are we going to end up with another dozen lawsuits. But you’ve got to take the good with the bad. ”

Net 1’s CPS unit has exploited its position and could now benefit further from an extension, said Bonita Meyersfeld, head of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg.

“They are capriciously targeting beneficiaries who are not necessarily literate,” she said in an interview. Now “they have the upper hand that makes their negotiating very strong. They are in a very strong negotiating position. I am nervous about what the cost of this would be.”

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Have you noticed a difference in the voices of women compared to men in virtual meetings?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, there is a difference.
31% - 23 votes
No, I haven't noticed it.
59% - 44 votes
A bad internet connection worsens it.
11% - 8 votes