FITA given go-ahead to appeal cigarette ban

(Photo: iStock)
(Photo: iStock)

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has granted the Fair Trade Independent Tobacco Association (FITA) leave to appeal the ban on the sale of cigarettes under the current Covid-19 lockdown regulations.

The group, which represents local manufacturers, had directly approached the SCA to consider the matter after its appeal bid was turned down by the High Court in July.

The SCA granted the appeal on Friday.

FITA spokesperson Sinenhlanhla Mnguni said the organisation had always been of the view that Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma "acted irrationally in implementing the ban on cigarette and related products".

"We are confident that once the matter is fully ventilated at the Supreme Court of Appeal, that court would arrive at a different decision to the one made by the full bench of the High Court," he said.

"We have maintained that the merits of our case are strong."

The decision comes as President Cyril Ramaphosa is expected to address the nation this weekend in a speech that is widely expected to provide guidance on the easing of lockdown regulations.

The court ruled that if FITA does not proceed with the appeal, it will bear the cost of the process.

ZAR/USD
16.95
(+0.27)
ZAR/GBP
21.78
(+0.56)
ZAR/EUR
19.90
(-0.12)
ZAR/AUD
12.09
(-0.08)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.66)
Gold
1897.46
(+0.78)
Silver
24.19
(+1.84)
Platinum
885.00
(+0.57)
Brent Crude
42.88
(+1.08)
Palladium
2305.01
(+2.82)
All Share
54506.88
(-0.39)
Top 40
50319.94
(-0.51)
Financial 15
10003.88
(+0.72)
Industrial 25
73358.17
(-0.86)
Resource 10
54053.58
(-0.58)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo
Company Snapshot
Voting Booth
Do you think it was a good idea for the government to approach the IMF for a $4.3 billion loan to fight Covid-19?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes. We need the money.
11% - 1390 votes
It depends on how the funds are used.
73% - 8999 votes
No. We should have gotten the loan elsewhere.
16% - 1985 votes
Vote