A study published on Wednesday by Harvard Law School and the Natural Resources Defence Council found that dates printed on packaged foods, which help retailers cycle through stocked products and allow manufacturers to indicate when a product is at its peak freshness, are inconsistent.
They confuse consumers, leading many to throw out food before it actually goes bad. "The labelling system is aimed at helping consumers understand freshness, but it fails – they think it's about safety. And (consumers) are wasting money and wasting food because of this misunderstanding," said co-author Emily Broad Lieb, who led the report from the Harvard Law School's Food Law and Policy Clinic. Broad Lieb and NRDC scientist Dana Gunders said that, while labels "appear to be a rational system", they are essentially meaningless to consumers.
Patchwork of laws
Manufacturers often decide on their own how to calculate shelf life and what the dates mean. As a result, huge amounts of food, not to mention considerable natural resources and labour, go to waste in landfill and taxes, and harm the environment. A lack of binding federal standards on labelling means the dates are governed by a patchwork of state and local laws.
"It's like the Wild West," Gunders said. The authors recommended that "sell-by" dates be invisible to consumers so they cannot be misinterpreted as safety labels; that a clear, uniform date label system be established; and that "smart labels" that rely on technology to provide food safety information be used more frequently. David Fikes, a spokesman for the Food Marketing Institute, which represents food retailers and wholesalers, said the group agreed there had to be a clearer way for the consumer to read dates. However, it disagreed that the code should be hidden from consumers, because that would make it difficult for store employees to stock shelves.
On Wednesday, Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D-NY) released a statement pressing for a consistent federal food dating system. "Under the current patchwork of state and federal laws, consumers are left in the lurch, forced to decipher the differences between 'sell-by' and 'best if used by', and too often food is either thrown out prematurely, or families wind up consuming dangerous or spoiled food," she said. Lack of understanding about the labels is not necessarily a health hazard. Researchers said they found no significant difference in incidents of food-borne illness between states such as Massachusetts, which has very strict labelling rules, and others such as New York, which is more lax.
In fact, University of Minnesota food safety
scientist Dr. Theodore Labuza, who reviewed the study, said that in his more
than 30 years of researching date labels, he was unaware of any outbreaks of
illness related to food being kept in the refrigerator or on the shelf past an
expiration date, as long as it was stored properly."People think the use-by
date means either the product is going to die or you're going to die if you eat
it. And it's just not true. You can't tie shelf life to a date," Labuza
said. "If the food looks rotten and smells bad, you should throw it away,
but just because it's past the date on the package, it doesn't mean it's