Large analysis of 170 countries shows that lockdown measures did reduce Covid-19 mortality

  • The effects of lockdown and other non-pharmaceuticals haven't been fully established
  • Researchers, therefore, did a comparative study of 170 governments and their measures 
  • Detailed calculations show that countries that took stringent measures might have lowered Covid-19 deaths

New research from the Universities of Oxford and Edinburgh suggests that, in the absence of a vaccine, early, strict government measures and non-pharmaceutical interventions may have resulted in significantly fewer Covid-19 deaths.

The aim of this study, published on medRxiv as a pre-print version, was to create a comprehensive database to track the response of 170 governments to the coronavirus, stretching from the period 1 January to 27 May 2020.

The aim of this research

The researchers wanted to determine whether the implementation of several non-pharmaceutical interventions such as lockdown measures, restrictions on travel, and physical distancing could reduce the impact of Covid-19 in these countries.

While there is no vaccine available, and while the virus and the effect of its antibodies are still poorly understood, there has been no other choice but to implement non-pharmaceutical interventions in conjunction with contact tracing and testing to physically halt the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19.

These interventions were different in each country, but many nations resorted to extreme lockdowns, which brought economic sectors and social activities to a complete standstill.

The exact cost of these policies in terms of the financial and health implications has not yet been determined.

What was the outcome?

The study implies that the maximum number of daily deaths could be linked to a delay of days to introduce the first set of measures. The mortality rate increased by 9% for each day of delay to introduce measures.

Where these measures were introduced, the daily growth rate of deaths fell by 0.080 percentage points.

The researchers specifically looked at Botswana and South Korea for their low rates of mortality, compared to the US, which had a high mortality rate and a slow start to control the outbreak.

The importance of this research for the future

As the outcome of non-pharmaceutical interventions has still not been entirely established, the researchers wanted to determine whether the measures had a significant impact on the Covid-19 mortality rate.

Their findings could help governments decide on their public health policies while a safe, effective vaccine and targeted treatment are still in development.

READ | A new, more infectious – but not deadlier – coronavirus strain is now the dominant global strain

READ | How to alleviate your fears of routine medical check-ups and errands during Covid-19 

READ | Wuhan study is showing how physical distancing to curb the spread of coronavirus is saving lives 

Image credit: Anna Shvets from Pexels 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Have you entered our Health of the Nation survey?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
27% - 9954 votes
73% - 26305 votes