Covid-19: Solutions proposed as shocking new child hunger numbers revealed

  • South Africa's progress toward ending childhood hunger may have been reversed by the coronavirus pandemic
  • The rise in child hunger during lockdown can be linked to loss of income and running out of money for food
  • To help address the situation, it is recommended that government reinstate a monthly top-up grant of R350 per child


Findings of a large survey released today show children may be the Covid-19 pandemic’s greatest victims and that the country’s progress towards ending hunger may have been reversed. The study, called the National Income Dynamics Study: Coronavirus Rapid Mobile Survey (NIDS-CRAM), includes data from roughly 7 000 respondents  across the country who were asked a series of questions telephonically about hunger, health and employment between May and June. 

“In a strange way, the virus has the least effect on children, but children are going to be the greatest victims of the pandemic,” says Professor Servaas van der Berg, an economist and National Research Foundation Chair in Social Policy from Stellenbosch University. Van der Berg is one of 30 social scientists involved in the survey. Today’s findings are based on the first of five planned waves of the survey.

The numbers 

Nearly half (47%) of all survey respondents reported running out of money for food in April, the first month of the country’s hard lockdown. Adding to this, 15% of respondents said that a child in the household had gone hungry in the last week (prior to the survey interview). In households with children, 8% of respondents reported frequent hunger, which is defined as three or more days per week. 

To put these numbers into perspective, the General Household Survey (GHS) conducted in 2018 found that 16% of households in South Africa reported child hunger, meaning that a child went hungry at some point in the last year. The CRAM findings are reflective of the beginning of the lockdown period, and van der Berg explains, can’t be compared to data like the GHS that reflect an entire year. 

“If one looks at what the GHS shows, we see a rapid decline in households reporting that children went hungry from about 35% in 2002 to about 17% in 2007. But then it first went up and, was almost stuck at that level, and gradually declined again. It’s clear that what drove the first part of that was the expansion of the Child Support Grant (CSG). After that we had the recession, and in the recession, it went up, and after that, we have had little economic growth, so it went down very slowly,” says van der Berg.

“With the 2007/8 recession, it did show an increase [in child hunger], but not a very great increase. One would expect the increase to be much higher [during the pandemic] because of the sharpness and severity of the [economic] decline,” he says. “It appears as if most of the decline we’ve seen in hunger has been reversed. The question now is for how long; is it permanent or short-term?”

Loss of income, no money for food and looming ECD closures

The noticeable rise in child and household hunger during the lockdown period can largely be linked to two things: the loss of income and running out of money for food, says van der Berg. The lockdown left many people unable to work, and this loss of income has become a driving factor for South Africa’s growing child hunger crisis.   

“We’ve got a very desperate situation in very many households, and it’s not something that will return very easily to normal. Even if the economy were to become fully open, many informal jobs won’t be available, but also some small businesses may no longer exist, which links onto something else, which is [Early Childhood Development/ECD] centres.”

Van der Berg says that the lockdown has threatened the viability of ECD centres, warning that many of them will not open again. 

“That’s another income for quite a number of people, and like many others, they’ve simply lost their source of income, and they may no longer be able to offer that service, which is problematic from the perspective of the parents who require someone to look after the children,” he says. One of the recommendations made by authors of the paper is to provide greater financial support to ECD centres.

“The focus of some of our recommendations is to spend more money [on young children], even if it is very difficult to find the money. The long-term consequences for children are massive, and it’s not only from [the pandemic] but also from the schools [closing] during lockdown.”

A way forward in a time of crisis

While the NIDS-CRAM findings may paint a grim picture for the immediate future of South Africa’s children, authors’ recommendations suggest a way forward that, if implemented, may greatly improve the situation. 

These recommendations are included in papers published today alongside the release of the survey data.

In terms of social grants, van der Berg says that the CSG is not enough to feed a child or a family for a month, and needs to be supplemented by other income. “The CSG was doing a very good job of keeping many, many children, not all, out of reported hunger. Even though that might not have been adequate in terms of nutrition, it did well before the pandemic. But now that the other sources of income that many households had have fallen away, it clearly is inadequate; it can no longer on its own keep households and their children out of deep poverty,” he says.

In this regard, it is recommended that government reinstate a per child per month top-up of the grant of R350.  “Initially they increased the CSG by R350 for one month in May, and then in June that fell away, and in its place came R500 for the caregiver. So, if you’ve got two children, clearly you’re worse off in June than you were in May. It would be better to keep this at a level per child, because in a sense you’re now favouring households which have one child, and if you’ve got four children, then that R500 is very little compared to the past,” says van der Berg. 

The authors also recommend that the functioning of new grants, such as the Covid-19 Relief Grant, should be improved. 

#SchoolMealsNow

In terms of schools, van der Berg and his co-authors recommend that the National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) be immediately reinstated to ensure all learners, regardless of school attendance, are provided with at least one meal per day. On top of this, it’s recommended that schools distribute perishable foods for learners to have at home during weekends.  

“When I did a bit of calculations as to what does [a school meal] convert to in terms of money, it’s not so much. It’s about R80 per month. If the household could provide this food at the same cost as the school, R80 would make up for the loss of school meals because it costs about R3,60 per child per meal, according to the data we’ve got,” says van der Berg. 

While this is important, he adds that even though the CSG top-up is a larger amount of money, it means that the child and other members of the household will be competing for its use. A school meal is a certainty for a child, as opposed to possible competition for food at home. “In those circumstances, the school meal takes on extra importance.”

Earlier this month, Equal Education and two schools in Limpopo sued the Minister of Basic Education and the MECs for Education to force the re-opening of the (National School Nutrition Programme [NSNP]) to all learners, regardless of whether they’d been phased back into school. 

Sasha Stevenson of SECTION27, which represented the applicants in this case, describes the hardships faced by families across the country following the suspension of the programme. “The families we spoke to talk about their children going hungry and lacking energy, families fighting over food, children finding work to support their families. Learners who returned to school and were being fed described their guilt at receiving a meal when their siblings remained at home and hungry,” she says. “The NSNP is one of the most successful anti-poverty and anti-child hunger interventions of the State. To fail to continue it in this time of national crisis is unforgivable.”

Stevenson also criticised the adequacy of measures put in place to feed children during the lockdown and school closures. “While the Department of Social Development intended to include families of learners who would normally receive NSNP meals in their plans for food relief, what they actually rolled out was a drop in the ocean,” she says. “On 29 May 2020, after two months of the State of Disaster, government claimed to have provided a total 788 000 food parcels to people in need. By comparison, the NSNP feeds over 9 million learners every day.”

*Note: SECTION27 is quoted in this article. Spotlight is published by SECTION27 and the TAC, but is editorially independent, an independence that the editors guard jealously. Spotlight is a member of the South African Press Council.

*This article was produced by Spotlight – health journalism in the public interest. Sign up for our newsletter.

Image credit: Black Star/Spotlight

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Have you entered our Health of the Nation survey?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes
34% - 9269 votes
No
66% - 17873 votes
Vote