Caesarean birth: long-term consequences not so bad

Caesarean section scar
Caesarean section scar

In a study of more than 5,000 children, Australian researchers said they found that Caesarean section delivery was not linked with a higher risk of health problems in childhood.

"This study suggests that some of the previously reported associations between birth by Caesarean delivery and adverse childhood health outcomes may be explained by influences other than mode of birth," said lead researcher Elizabeth Westrupp, a research fellow in the School of Nursing at La Trobe University in Melbourne.

Reassuring findings

The researchers concluded that Caesarean delivery was associated with a mix of positive and negative outcomes through early childhood, and few were consistent.

Read: Delivery option

For example, the association between Caesarean delivery and childhood obesity might actually be explained by the mother's obesity, Westrupp said.

"These findings should be reassuring to women and their doctors," she added.

The report was published online in the journal Paediatrics.

For the study, Westrupp and her colleagues used data on more than 5,100 kids born in Australia in 2003 and 2004. The children were followed to the age of 7 years.

Specifically, researchers looked at overall health and conditions such as asthma and body weight. They also looked at medications children were taking, any disabilities or medical problems, and social and economic circumstances.

The researchers then adjusted their findings to take into account the mother's social environment and weight, and whether the child was breast-fed.

Initially, Westrupp's team found that children born by C-section were more likely to have a medical condition at age 2 or 3, use prescribed drugs at age 6 or 7, and to weigh more at age 8 or 9.

Problematic for the mother

However, the child's excess body weight reflected the mother's obesity, not being born by C-section, Westrupp said.

Read: Vaginal delivery connected to lower morbidity in twins

And Caesarean delivery was linked with better overall health at age 2 or 3 and better social skills at age 6 or 7, the researchers reported.

When Westrupp's group took into account factors not related to delivery method, the association between childhood health and C-sections tended to weaken even further.

"When we took into account factors related to birth, social disadvantage, maternal weight and breast-feeding, we found few associations between Caesarean birth and child outcomes," she said.

Dr Aaron Caughey, chair of the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, said, "I don't think we should be doing Caesarean deliveries without a medical indication. But just because you ended up needing a C-section, I don't think that you should be worried that your child can suffer some long-term consequences."

Scant evidence exists to support the idea that C-sections can be bad for the health of the infant, he added.

However, Caughey said that although a C-section might not hurt the infant, it can be problematic for the mother.

Absolutely lifesaving

"If you make a hole into someone's body, all sorts of bad things can happen," he said. These can include damage to organs, excess bleeding and infection. After a C-section, a woman also experiences a lot of pain.

That doesn't mean that there aren't good reasons to have a Caesarean delivery, Caughey said. "In some cases, it is absolutely lifesaving for both the baby and the mother," he said.

Read: Older moms = more Caesarians

Medical reasons for a C-section include having had a previous Caesarean delivery, situations where the baby is not correctly positioned in the womb and problems with the infant's heart function.

Still, Caughey believes that too many women are having their babies delivered by C-section. For the past several years, groups like the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have been advocating for fewer C-sections, he said.

"We have encouraged doctors to be thoughtful and not do C-sections willy-nilly," Caughey noted.

Since 2010, the number of C-sections has levelled off, he said. "In 2014, it was 0.5 percent lower than in 2013, dropping from 32.7 percent to 32.2 percent. It's the biggest drop we've seen in 20 years that's 20,000 fewer C-sections."

Among women who have never had a Caesarean delivery, the rate of C-sections shouldn't be above 15 percent, Caughey said. "In most hospitals, it's above 20 percent," he said.

"A woman should work with her doctor and midwife and think about the process and what's best for her," Caughey said. "We think that it's generally safe to have a vaginal delivery."

Read more:

Multiple Caesarean deliveries risky for mom

Rich women choose Caesarean births over natural

Caesarean scarring reduced

Image: Caesarean section scar from iStock

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
The ANC's leadership race is heating up. Who do you think will be elected party president at Nasrec in December?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has got it in the bag
7% - 838 votes
I foresee a second term for Cyril Ramaphosa
83% - 9650 votes
Don’t discount a Zweli Mkhize win
10% - 1131 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.