Vit D supplement during pregnancy largely unnecessary

accreditation

Taking vitamin D supplements during pregnancy does not improve a baby's bone density, according to a new British study.

No significant differences

But for babies born in the winter, "sunshine vitamin" supplementation may help counteract low levels caused by seasonal loss of sunlight, the researchers said.

Some previous studies have suggested that higher vitamin D in mothers during pregnancy are associated with greater bone density in babies, and guidelines in the United Kingdom recommend vitamin D supplements for all pregnant women.

However, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists only recommends supplements for mothers-to-be who are deficient in vitamin D. 

Read: Vitamin D important during pregnancy

This study included more than 1,100 British women, 14 to 17 weeks pregnant, with low to normal levels of vitamin D. Half took a 1,000 International Unit vitamin D capsule daily until they had their baby, while the other half took a placebo.

Overall, there were no significant differences in bone mass between babies born to women who took vitamin D supplements and those who took the placebo, researchers reported.

But among babies born in the winter, those whose mothers took vitamin D supplements had greater bone mass than those whose mothers took the placebo.

Most important source

The researchers also found that among mothers who delivered in the winter, vitamin D levels fell between 14 and 34 weeks of pregnancy in the placebo group, but not in the vitamin D supplementation group.

Read: Vitamin D could make childbirth less painful

That suggests that for women in the late stages of pregnancy during winter, vitamin D supplements may counteract the decrease in normal vitamin D levels caused by lack of sunlight, the researchers said.

The study results were published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

"Babies' bones strengthen during the last stages of pregnancy. Since sunlight is our most important source of vitamin D, mothers' levels of vitamin D tend to drop from summer to winter, and babies born in the winter months tend to have lower bone density than those born during the summer," said study co-author Nicholas Harvey. He is a professor of rheumatology and clinical epidemiology at the University of Southampton.

Read: Low vitamin D in pregnancy linked to kids' cavities

This study "has given us the first evidence that supplementing mothers with vitamin D during pregnancy counteracts the seasonal drop in maternal vitamin D levels and may help to ensure good bone development in these winter births", Harvey said in a journal news release.

Away from mass medication

Low maternal concentrations of vitamin D in pregnancy have been associated with gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, infants who are small for their gestational age, and lower child bone mass, Ian Reid wrote in an accompanying journal editorial.

As this and other trials of vitamin D supplementation are being completed, "these offer the possibility of determining which associations represent causation, and of guiding clinical practice", said Reid, a professor of medicine at the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

Reid concluded that "in pregnancy and other contexts, we should be moving to targeted supplementation with vitamin D in individuals likely to have [low vitamin D concentrations] and away from mass medication, which is without proved benefit".

Read more: 

Why you should eat chocolate during pregnancy 

Vit D in pregnancy good for baby's brain 

Vit D deficiency = small babies

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Eskom has considered continuous load shedding at Stage 2, instead of introducing it when the power system faces a crunch. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'm all for it - we're going to have power cuts regardless, so we might as well have some stability to better plan our lives
45% - 4715 votes
No thanks! I prefer having periods of no load shedding and we cannot normalise this crisis
55% - 5785 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.07
-0.6%
Rand - Pound
19.32
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
17.37
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.67
+0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.1%
Gold
1,624.34
-1.2%
Silver
18.38
-2.6%
Palladium
2,050.86
-1.1%
Platinum
853.58
-0.6%
Brent Crude
86.15
-5.0%
Top 40
57,290
+0.3%
All Share
63,626
+0.3%
Resource 10
56,215
-0.2%
Industrial 25
79,529
+1.4%
Financial 15
13,982
-1.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE