World Cup sponsorship hypocrisy

iStock published its views on the conspicuous lack of healthy foods and sports nutrition products on June 12 in an article that drew an inbox full of feedback in agreement.

But what measures could be taken to ensure that future sporting events send out a healthier message?

Government's responsibility

Writing in The Lancet, Jeff Collin and Ross MacKenzie of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Health in Social Science said that the responsibility lies with governments to reassess the scope of existing regulation governing sponsorship in sporting events, and the terms of public investment in elite sport.

They pointed out that investment in sporting infrastructure is justified in terms of the benefits to public health, but said that the message is complicated by sponsorships with companies selling alcohol, fast food and sugary drinks.

“Even if expanded regulation of sponsorship is currently deemed inappropriate, governments should examine such broader effects and attach health-promoting conditions to public funding of sports,” they wrote.

For consumer watchdog Which?, the answer may lie further down the chain. Chief policy advisor Sue Davies called on the UK Office of Communications (Offcom) to step in to prevent advertisements for unhealthy food being seen by children.

“The summer of sport could be the perfect opportunity to get kids into physical activity and health eating,” said Which? chief policy advisor Sue Davies, “but it sends very mixed messages when fast food companies pay millions to sponsor high-profile events like the World Cup”.

She added: “Both food companies and FIFA have a duty to promote sport responsibly. Which? is calling on Offcom to use its power to regulate so that these messages can not be shown during ad breaks when children are watching TV.”

Consumers express concern

A survey conducted by Which? indicated that it is not only the professionals that are questioning the message being propagated by World Cup sponsorship.

In a telephone survey conducted by Which? in early May, adult consumers also expressed their concern. Fifty-four percent of the 1001 adults interviewed agreed that brands associated with unhealthy food should not have been allowed to sponsor this year’s World Cup, and 36 percent strongly agreed.

Source: Decision News Media

Read more:

World Cup loses to junk food

Experts slam SWC junk food sponsors

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Gauteng DA leader Solly Msimanga says the party's voters want it to explore conditional coalition talks with the ANC. 
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
It's a step in the right direction. An ANC-DA coalition would be the most stable option for SA
33% - 4066 votes
The DA should focus on working with all opposition parties, including the EFF, to unseat the ANC
14% - 1807 votes
The DA should rather remain in opposition than form a coalition with the ANC or the EFF
53% - 6630 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.