Annual pelvic exams may not be crucial

accreditation

Women, the US medical establishment isn't doing away with annual pelvic exams – at least just yet. But a panel of US medical experts has concluded there's no proof the dreaded check-up benefits healthy women who aren't pregnant.

More research needed

In a draft recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force said it couldn't weigh in for or against routine pelvic exams based on current evidence.

"The Task Force is calling for more research to better understand the benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic exams in women without any complaints or symptoms," said Dr Francisco Garcia, a task force member. He is director and chief medical officer of the Pima County Department of Health in Tucson, Arizona.

Read: Most women don't need regular pelvic exams

The task force statement applies only to symptom-free, non-pregnant women. Women should still be screened for cervical cancer – every three years from ages 21 to 29 and every five years from ages 30 to 65. Sexually active women should also be screened for gonorrhoea and chlamydia, the task force said.

"Women with gynaecologic symptoms or concerns should discuss them with their clinicians," said task force member Dr Maureen Phipps, chair of obstetrics and gynaecology at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island.

Little evidence of benefit

Women all over will likely rejoice if the periodic exam falls by the wayside. Clothed only in a surgical gown with their feet elevated in surgical stirrups, patients endure prodding and poking while a doctor explores the vagina, cervix, uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries.

Nearly 63 million pelvic exams were performed in the United States in 2010, according to the task force. But it found "insufficient" data to support their value. What evidence there is may be of poor or conflicting quality, the task force statement said.

Read: Routine pelvic exams don't save lives

While no studies evaluated the exam's ability to prevent disease or death, research did turn up harms such as unnecessary surgeries caused by "false positive" test results, the task force noted.

Other influential medical groups have also questioned the value of annual pelvic exams. The American College of Physicians in 2014 recommended discontinuing routine pelvic exams because of little evidence of benefit.

But the annual exam still has the support of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG), which believes these visits help build doctor-patient trust.

Much more to annual exam

How the US task force recommendation will affect current practice – or insurance coverage – remains to be seen. Although the US government doesn't have to heed the panel's findings, it usually does. This, in turn, could alter coverage by Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act as well as private insurance companies.

Read: Causes of cervical cancer

The panel will welcome public comments until July 25, and then issue its final statement sometime after that.

Dr Jill Rabin is co-chief of the division of ambulatory care at Women's Health Programmes-PCAP Services, at Northwell Health in New Hyde Park, New York.

She said she agrees with ACOG that all women should see their obstetrician/gynaecologist annually.

"There's much more to an annual exam than a pelvic examination," she said, citing potential health problems that may not have obvious symptoms.

As for an annual pelvic exam, Rabin called for "shared decision-making between the patient and her physician".

Read more:

When cervical cancer strikes 

Top 10 cervical cancer myths 

10 scary cervical cancer facts

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Have you entered our Health of the Nation survey?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes
31% - 9519 votes
No
69% - 20861 votes
Vote