Intelligence is not a remedy for racism

iStock

Smart people are just as racist as their less intelligent peers — they're just better at concealing their prejudice, according to a University of Michigan study.

"High-ability whites are less likely to report prejudiced attitudes and more likely to say they support racial integration in principle," said Geoffrey Wodtke, a doctoral candidate in sociology. "But they are no more likely than lower-ability whites to support open housing laws and are less likely to support school busing and affirmative action programmes."

Wodtke will present his findings at the 108th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. The National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, part of the National Institutes of Health, supported his research.

How the study was done

He analysed data on the racial attitudes of more than 20 000 white respondents from the nationally representative General Social Survey. He examined how their cognitive ability, as measured by a widely used test of verbal intelligence, was linked with their attitudes about African-Americans, and about different policies designed to redress racial segregation and discrimination.

Respondents were about 47 years old at the time of the interview, on average, and had completed 12.9 years of education. They correctly answered an average of about six of the 10 cognitive ability test questions.

Among Wodtke's findings:

• High-ability whites were more likely than low-ability whites to reject residential segregation and to support school integration in principle, and they were more likely to acknowledge racial discrimination in the workplace. But there were only trivial differences across cognitive ability levels in support for policies designed to realise racial equality in practice.

• In some cases, more intelligent whites were actually less likely to support remedial policies for racial inequality. For example, about 27% of the least intelligent whites supported school busing programmes, compared with 23% of the most intelligent whites.

"The principle-policy paradox is much more pronounced among high-ability whites than among low-ability whites," said Wodtke, who is also affiliated with the Population Studies Center at the U-M Institute for Social Research. "There's a disconnect between the attitudes intelligent whites support in principle and their attitudes toward policies designed to realise racial equality in practice.

"Intelligent whites give more enlightened responses than less intelligent whites to questions about their attitudes, but their responses to questions about actual policies aimed at redressing racial discrimination are far less enlightened. For example, although nearly all whites with advanced cognitive abilities say that 'whites have no right to segregate their neighbourhoods,' nearly half of this group remains content to allow prejudicial real estate practices to continue unencumbered by open housing laws."

The real reason for racism

According to Wodtke, the broader implication of this study is that racism and prejudice don't simply come about as a result of low mental capacities or deficiencies in socialization. Rather, they result from the need of dominant groups to legitimise and protect their privileged social position within an intergroup conflict over resources.

"More intelligent members of the dominant group are just better at legitimising and protecting their privileged position than less intelligent members," he said. "In modern America, where blacks are mobilized to challenge racial inequality, this means that intelligent whites say — and may in fact truly believe — all the right things about racial equality in principle, but they just don't actually do anything that would eliminate the privileges to which they have become accustomed.

"In many cases, they have become so accustomed to these privileges that they become 'invisible,' and any effort to point these privileges out or to eliminate them strikes intelligent whites as a grave injustice."

 
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 1321 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 7406 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 1540 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.17
-0.5%
Rand - Pound
20.94
-0.2%
Rand - Euro
18.72
-0.4%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.10
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.5%
Platinum
1,022.94
-0.2%
Palladium
1,683.39
+0.8%
Gold
1,912.51
-0.0%
Silver
23.36
-0.5%
Brent Crude
82.17
-0.8%
Top 40
73,440
-0.3%
All Share
79,610
-0.2%
Resource 10
74,329
-0.5%
Industrial 25
102,542
-0.1%
Financial 15
16,490
-0.4%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE