the Johannesburg high court today.
position because of a breakdown of trust, even though his removal from the post
had been illegal.
over whether Maroga had resigned amid conflicting reports from the board and
process with a view to compensation.
been allowed to respond to allegations of poor performance, a right that was
detailed in his contract.
performance, namely failure to produce a funding model to save Eskom money and
to renegotiate Eskom’s long-term contracts, cannot be true as, at the end of
December 2009, Eskom [had] saved R10 billion due to Mr Maroga’s actions,” read