The F-Word: We are all victims of farm attacks

It is with a great sense of shame that I find myself guilty of the same offence as ultraright movements such as AfriForum and the Transvaal Agricultural Union (TAU). Like them, I have decided that farmers are white and the people who ­attack them are black. Each time I have read or heard about a crime on a farm, my mind’s picture has shown me black, mostly young, males as perpetrators and old, white men in safari suits as victims.

I am therefore guilty of the terrible crime of racial profiling. There may be many instances where it is indeed a fact that young blacks are perpetrators and whites are victims.

But it is simply racist and short-sighted to think that in each farm attack, the cast is exactly as my very South African mind has configured it.

It is no different to thinking that crimes such as house robberies, burglaries and hijackings in suburbia are committed by those who intend to steal from whites simply because they are white.

If this was the case, house robbers who stole from my house would have noticed that my children, whom they found and gagged, were black and therefore left without stealing anything. They didn’t.

They weren’t bothered by racial ­political correctness.

It would have made everyone’s life easy if criminals were as fixated on race as in their choices of whom they steal from
or murder.

At least we would know whom to avoid and whom to run to for help.

Crime is probably the most equal-opportunity industry we have. All of us stand an equal chance of being victims as long as we own goods that criminals place a value on.

As suburbia is, for historical reasons, mainly white, most farmers are white and therefore most attacks against farmers will be against white farmers.

There are many farmers who are black and who are as affected by the same ­security issues as their colleagues, ­regardless of their colour.

But to dwell on skin colour diverts ­focus from an important battle of ­protecting the commercial farming sector and thereby ensuring food security in our country.

AfriForum and the TAU, on the other hand, believe that these crimes are a result of black people attacking whites on their farms just because the farmers are white. To them, blacks seek to harm them just to settle a historical score.
This kind of thinking clouds the issue and ­deprives an important South African ­constituency of a collective rage against those who seek to harm them and, by ­extension, us.

AfriForum and the TAU might think that they are speaking on their behalf, but by making the farming community a race or an ethnic group rather than an economic sector, they do this hard-working group a grave injustice.

They make South Africans, who are ­uninterested in or tired of race politics, ­indifferent to the wrongs perpetrated against farmers.

Intentionally or not, they perpetrate the stereotype of a farmer being a racist, white, male stuck in a 1977 state of mind.
All crime is unacceptable wherever it happens and whatever the motives of the criminal might be. To politicise it for short-term benefits serves no one.

Instead, as we have seen in this ­country, it alienates many who would and should be allies.

There can be no denying that there are farmers who treat fellow human beings who work for them worse than the ­animals they farm. But this is true for every sector where human beings employ other human beings.

There is no business sector (except ­perhaps in organised crime) where ­murdering your boss or those who work for you is an acceptable way of settling labour disputes.

AfriForum and the TAU must therefore get off their high horses and stop ­marginalising other South Africans who are affronted by crime against the ­farming community by making this a race issue when it is not.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Who do you think is going to win the 2020 US election?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Biden is going to take it
47% - 7786 votes
It's four more years for Trump
53% - 8941 votes
Vote
All Share
55339.58
(+0.99)
Top 40
50692.28
(+0.83)
Financial 15
10790.70
(+3.99)
Industrial 25
74905.70
(+1.05)
Resource 10
52561.57
(-0.49)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo