MANY students will, for the first time, encounter what is called an open-book assessment once they start writing tests and exams at their public university or private higher-education institution.
And while the open-book method is a great tool for measuring depth of understanding, too many students initially, and mistakenly, think that taking a book into the testing centre means little to no preparation is required. This could not be further from the truth, an education expert warns.
“Open-book assessments involve more engagement by the students, because they need to use a combination of memory, creativity and logical thinking. They also result in less pre-assessment anxiety for the students, knowing they don’t need to recall facts. This is especially advantageous to students who have difficulty in this area,” said Nola Payne, head of faculty: information and communications technology at The Independent Institute of Education, SA’s largest private higher education institution.
Payne says that it is, however, a major misconception that an open-book assessment means there is no need to study or prepare before the exam.
“This is untrue, because students need to really engage with the material and understand how the concepts and theory can be applied, and they should, in particular, practise any numeracy or practical content before they enter the exam room,” she said.
Time management is also a factor in open-book assessments, says Payne.
“There is little time for students to page through their textbooks and other resources searching for answers. A good open-book assessment will not have the answers in the permitted resources, but rather refer to the methods and related content. The assessment will still need to be engaged with and students are required to provide a carefully considered response.”
Payne says there is a familiar scenario that plays out for many students who are not used to the open-book method of testing.
“Firstly, there may be a misconception that you don’t need to study, because you will have access to prescribed textbooks and resources, which is false.
“Secondly, upon sitting down and reading the exam, students may realise that the books won’t contain the answers as they may have thought.
“And then finally, the student may realise that the examiner doesn’t want recalled facts, but a deeper understanding of the content.”
It is therefore incumbent on all good institutions to ensure that new students, many of whom will be unfamiliar with the open-book approach, are properly coached before entering the exam room, says Payne.
Higher education institutions must modernise testing methods, she says.
In addition to ensuring students are empowered to perform optimally when taking open-book tests, good institutions need to review and update the methodology of these kinds of tests, with particular attention to developments in the digital space, she says.
“Traditionally, open-book assessments allowed students access to printed material authorised by their lecturers,” said Payne.
“That was acceptable when students purchased hard-copy textbooks or used articles or publication as references. This is no longer the case. A large proportion of students, both nationally and internationally, no longer purchase hard-copy books but rather make use of e-books, online videos, tutorials and web pages for their content and to enhance their learning. Taking this learning style into account, academic assessment methods need to adapt to the digital age.”
However, too many institutions remain reluctant to change their assessment methods and have discounted the new way of learning that the current generation of students use.
“Progressive institutions must make the necessary digital resources available for students to reference in the open-book assessment, but still ensure that the assessment requires the students to use these as references and not search for an answer in the permissible resources. By providing access to these digital resources, it would be important for the institution to build in restrictions such as that no student will be able to message their peers. These can be restricted (along with locking down browsers) by using smart software solutions,” she said.
The open-book assessment makes sense when one looks forward to the workplace, where an employee will not be given a task while not being permitted to complete it by accessing the Internet.
“The employer expects the employee to have the fundamental knowledge for their chosen career, but expects the employee to be able to use that knowledge to construct a solution, much like an open-book assessment,” said Payne.
She argues that if citizens and employees of today (and in future) are expected to have access to the Internet to perform certain tasks in their daily lives, it doesn’t make sense that institutions would be reluctant to test students without this resource and would rather use closed-book assessments.
“We need to prepare our next generation to be able to adapt to the workplace and provide them with the necessary skills to use to be more efficient and effective in their careers.
“Employers would prefer to have employees who can use all the tools available to them to come up with great solutions, and not employees who are great at recalling facts. There will always be things we don’t know, and this includes specialists in all areas or disciplines.
“The amount we don’t know far exceeds that which we do. And the most valuable skill we can give our youth is the ability to sort and filter relevant information and apply it in a meaningful way.” — Supplied.