Dros rape trial enters final stages - what we know so far

Nicholas Ninow's mother, Chantelle watches on as he leaves court.. (Deaan Vivier)
Nicholas Ninow's mother, Chantelle watches on as he leaves court.. (Deaan Vivier)

WARNING: This story contains graphic details

The trial of Nicholas Ninow, the man who admitted raping a 7-year-old girl in the bathroom of a Dros establishment in Pretoria last year, enters its final leg on Thursday before the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria gives its judgment.

This comes after the State and defence closed their cases on Wednesday – the State after calling six witnesses and the defence after calling none.

On Monday, Ninow pleaded guilty to raping the child.

But he is being tried because the State has rejected the plea on the basis that aspects of his story do not align with the evidence the State has.

In his plea explanation, he pleaded guilty to two counts of rape, one count of defeating the ends of justice and one count of possession of an illegal substance, which tested positive for a drug known as CAT.

He also pleaded not guilty to the assault of two Dros employees. The State withdrew a charge of kidnapping.

READ: Nicholas Ninow details rape in Dros bathroom

Ninow claimed he was in the women's bathroom snorting CAT, when the victim entered, wanting to urinate.

He then pulled down her pants and put her on the toilet, before forcing his penis into her mouth and inserting his fingers into her vagina.

But it is the State's case that Ninow followed the victim to the bathroom and that he had the intention of raping her.

The State's six witnesses were two waitresses, including one who served Ninow on the day, Johan Fourie, who had a drink with Ninow at the restaurant that day, the childminder who looked after the children at the restaurant, the victim and the victim's mother.

On Wednesday morning, the court heard that the mother saw Ninow use her daughter's clothes to clean his penis.

READ MORE: 'No parent should see what I witnessed' - mother of Dros rape victim

"I pushed the door, called out the child's name. Then she called me back saying, 'mommy help me'. Then the person that was behind the door said: 'You are disturbing me, what is it that you want?'" the mother testified.

She added that she found Ninow completely naked and that her daughter was not wearing her tights or her underwear.

"There is no parent who should see what I have witnessed. What I have seen has made me very emotional," she told the court.

Ninow's Legal Aid attorney Herman Alberts  closed the defence's case without calling any witnesses.

Ninow is expected to return to the high court on Thursday where the State and defence are expected to present their closing arguments.

The court will then give its verdict.

Since the start of the trial, Ninow's grandmother and mother have been present at court.

In addition, members of the ANC Women's League, the EFF, activist group #Notinmyname and other organisations have also attended the proceedings.

Lockdown For
Voting Booth
Do you know what your baby's name means?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
No, we just chose one we loved
43% - 675 votes
Yes, we researched the meaning carefully
42% - 660 votes
Yes, it's a traditional family name
15% - 241 votes
Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo