Fees Must Fall activist Kanya Cekeshe turns to High Court to challenge conviction

Kanya Cekeshe.
Kanya Cekeshe.
Azarrah Karrim, News24

Fees Must Fall student activist Kanya Cekeshe has turned to the Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg on an urgent basis in his bid to challenge his conviction.

His latest move comes after the Johannesburg Central Magistrate's Court dismissed his application for leave to appeal his conviction and his application for bail, pending the outcome of the application.

Cekeshe, believed to be one of the last Fees Must Fall student activists still in prison, was convicted of public violence and malicious damage to property when he tried to set a police van alight during protests in 2016.

READ | Justice minister aims to get presidential pardon for #FeesMustFall activist Kanya Cekeshe

He received an eight-year sentence and has been held at the Leeuwkop Correctional Centre in Bryanston, Johannesburg, since 2017.

But he sought leave to appeal his conviction and wanted to be released on bail, pending the outcome.

Cekeshe's defence team, led by advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi and Wikus Steyl, argued that the lawyer who represented him in the trial was incompetent. 

They also argued that there were discrepancies between the charges against Cekeshe and what was in his statement.

However, handing down judgment on Monday, Magistrate Theunis Carstens said there was no merit in the arguments.

He said Cekeshe had admitted to the allegations against him and described the arguments submitted as "opportunistic".

R5 000 bail

A notice dated October 15, which Ian Levitt Attorneys filed at the High Court and which News24 has seen, stated: "The applicant asks for the order setting aside the decision and judgment of the magistrate and granting the applicant bail pending the outcome of his petition against both conviction and sentence, in the amount of R5 000."

In an affidavit, which News24 has also seen, Steyl stated that the notice was an appeal against the "wrong decision of Magistrate Carstens". 

He said he also brought the application to secure Cekeshe's release on bail, pending the determination of the application for leave to appeal.

Steyl also stated that he believed the student activist had prospects of success on appeal and that Carstens was "wrong" to arrive at a contrary decision.

Impermissible approach

Steyl also said Carstens relied on evidence given during sentencing proceedings and submitted that this approach was "impermissible".

"Evidence led during sentencing cannot be used to justify the incorrect application of Section 112(2) of the [Criminal Procedure Act]".

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When a Covid-19 vaccine for under 16's becomes available, will you be taking your children to get it?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, immediately!
38% - 3220 votes
I'll wait to see how others respond
26% - 2216 votes
No, I don't think they need it
36% - 3106 votes
Vote
ZAR/USD
14.93
(+0.14)
ZAR/GBP
20.85
(+0.13)
ZAR/EUR
18.05
(+0.04)
ZAR/AUD
11.69
(-0.37)
ZAR/JPY
0.14
(+0.23)
Gold
1734.32
(+0.60)
Silver
26.66
(+0.62)
Platinum
1202.00
(+1.56)
Brent Crude
63.29
(-1.13)
Palladium
2374.00
(+1.26)
All Share
68510.75
(+1.44)
Top 40
63104.70
(+1.61)
Financial 15
12568.48
(+0.90)
Industrial 25
89150.72
(+1.21)
Resource 10
70539.82
(+2.28)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo