The State Security Agency (SSA) has allegedly spent more than R1bn in irregular expenditure over the past five years – and now refuses to account for this because its operations are “classified”.
A joint investigation by City Press’ sister publications, Rapport and News24, has found that National Treasury has increasingly been at loggerheads with the SSA over the mismanagement of what has been estimated to amount to R1.5bn.
The abuse of funds allegedly includes the suspicious use of the SSA’s covert fund, as well as breaches of prescribed procurement procedures.
Seven independent sources, who are directly involved or have insight into Treasury and the country’s intelligence services, confirmed that between the 2012/13 and 2015/16 financial years, Treasury repeatedly asked the SSA for clarity on its expenditure.
But, according to the same sources, the SSA refuses to account for how this money was spent, saying its activities are “secret”.
These sources say money budgeted for less secret operations was inexplicably moved to the covert fund, and the spies cannot explain why that was necessary.
Last year, Treasury apparently even threatened to cut funding for secret operations entirely if the SSA could not account for at least some of its tender processes.
“There was a big problem with the SSA’s funds,” said one source.
“Treasury officials kept asking them how they tendered for goods and services, and they kept saying that they could not tell us because it was classified information.
"But some Treasury officials have the same level of security clearance as top SSA staff.
“Treasury understood that they [SSA staff] couldn’t have open tender processes and disclose their covert operations, but they asked the SSA to at least submit a list of suppliers so that there could be a degree of oversight.”
A second source, familiar with the negotiations between the SSA and Treasury, confirmed that SSA had asked to be exempt from prescribed tender processes, as well as the Public Finance Management Act and other laws.
“We always questioned if this sort of exemption would be justified,” said the source.
These revelations come amid recent scandals, in which it was alleged that intelligence services were being abused for political purposes.
"No information on this matter"
Earlier this month, the Mail & Guardian newspaper reported that the SSA’s covert fund was abused to spy on Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa.
In 2014, City Press reported on the existence of a covert unit, which was allegedly tasked with driving political operations for President Jacob Zuma.
A spy with close ties to Zuma, Thulani Dhlomo, was head of the special operations unit between 2012 and 2015.
In 2014, City Press reported that this unit was linked to the campaign to purge senior SA Revenue Service officials, including then acting commissioner Ivan Pillay and then group executive Johann van Loggerenberg.
But, last month, Dhlomo was appointed ambassador to Japan. Five sources said this move came shortly after the irregular expenditure of hundreds of millions of rands of covert funds.
It is understood that Sonto Kudjoe, the SSA’s former director-general, resigned last year after repeatedly questioning the mismanagement of the unit’s finances.
In its 2013/14 annual report, the joint standing committee on intelligence indicated that the department of state security’s internal auditors had already found that the SSA’s covert funds were being misapplied and that procurement procedures were being violated.
Nothing came of these findings.
In addition, the SSA received a qualified audit in the 2012/13 and 2014/15 financial years.
These Auditor-General reports were tabled in Parliament as part of the joint standing committee on intelligence’s 2013/14 and 2015/16 annual reports.
Repeated attempts to reach Dhlomo at his office in Japan were unsuccessful.
Gift Masina, Dhlomo’s personal assistant and third secretary at the South African embassy in Tokyo, undertook to answer questions by email, but failed to do so.
Treasury referred questions to the SSA, saying: “Unfortunately, the National Treasury officials from all the divisions have indicated they have no information on this matter.”
SSA spokesperson Brian Dube denied that the special operations unit had access to any covert fund and insisted that the SSA sent monthly reports to Treasury.
“There have not been any audit findings about these unsubstantiated allegations,” he said.
“The SSA’s budget is allocated on the basis of an approved annual performance plan.”
TALK TO US
Should the State Security Agency be held accountable for its expenditure?
SMS us on 35697 using the keyword SPIES and tell us what you think, Include your name and surname. SMSes cost R1.50