- Brian Hlongwa has questioned calls for his arrest after four senior former employees appeared in court over R1.2 billion tender corruption.
- Hlongwa said it was the NPA who had to decide who to prosecute.
- He said corruption allegations have been made against him since 2007.
Former Gauteng Health MEC Brian Hlongwa has spurned calls for his arrest after four senior former employees in the department appeared in court over R1.2 billion tender corruption on Thursday.
"Is it not the NPA that make decisions who to prosecute or not? Why must I be arrested. Why must I be arrested?" he told News24 over the phone.
"Prosecutorial decisions are made by the NPA. Allegations have been made against me and I am not arrested. We are talking about something that happened 13 years ago. Why must I be arrested? I have nothing to say," Hlongwa said.
NPA national spokesperson Sipho Ngwema told News24 they had not ruled out further arrests.
Ngwema said: "Investigations are not completed. We can't say who is in and who is out. I don't know if he [Hlongwa] will be arrested. We should expect more action in relation to this case."
In a statement on Thursday, DA Gauteng health spokesperson and MPL Jack Bloom asked why Hlongwa was not in the dock alongside Sybil Ngcobo, Mmakgosi Mosupi, Valdis Romaano and Obakeng Mookeletsi.
"I have long suspected that the long delay in bringing this case to trial has been because Hlongwa had political protection. The Gauteng health department has still not recovered from his disastrous tenure when financial controls dissolved, and service delivery suffered," Bloom said.
"There should be no fear or favour in ensuring that Hlongwa is also held to account along with others in this matter."
Ngcobo was granted R8 000 bail, while Mosupi, Ramaano and Mookeletsi were each granted R25 000 bail by the Commercial Crimes Court in Palm Ridge on Thursday.
They appeared on charges of corruption and contravention of the Public Finance Management Act.
John Richard Payne and Phil Austin, and their respective companies, Ukwakha Dezign (Pty) Ltd and Life Channel Communications (Pty) Ltd, were expected to appear alongside the four on charges of corruption.
However, their warrants of arrest could not be executed as they are out of the country.
The investigation by the Hawks followed an investigation by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), which was authorised by former president Jacob Zuma in May 2010.
The SIU was to investigate the procurement and contracting for goods and services in respect of the provisioning of a Health Information System and Electronic Health Records by the department during or around December 2007.
They also had to investigate all the irregularities surrounding the contract.
News24 previously reported that the SIU report linked Hlongwa to corruption while he was in the position between 2006 and 2009.
The Gauteng health department approved an open tender process for these systems, subject to confirmation of funding by the Gauteng Treasury, said Ngwema.
The tender was subsequently awarded to the Baoki Consortium, with an estimated cost of R630 million.
"However, the final total value of the tender awarded to Baoki Consortium was R1 045 174 125.12."
The negotiation for the systems rollout agreement for the department was handled by 3P Consulting on its behalf.
In its report, the SIU uncovered evidence of various trips, funded by 3P Consulting, for Hlongwa and a few department officials during 2006-2009, News24 reported.
"No evidence was obtained of Hlongwa declaring the trips or paying/reimbursing 3P Consulting for these trips," read part of the report.
Hlongwa previously said the SIU report was nothing new and a ploy "to embarrass the Gauteng ANC".
"In October 2014, the Hawks informed me that they had issued a warrant for my arrest, again, in respect of the self-same allegations which are now summarised in the SIU Report. I arranged to hand myself over to the Hawks," he said at the time.
"My legal representatives had already prepared affidavits in support of the inevitable bail application when the Hawks informed me that, at that point in time, they would not be proceeding with my arrest. I am not privy to their reasons."