Wife killer Rob Packham files another application for leave to appeal after failed SCA bid

Rob Packham has approached the SCA again after dismissing application for leave to appeal his conviction. (Netwerk24)
Rob Packham has approached the SCA again after dismissing application for leave to appeal his conviction. (Netwerk24)

Constantia businessman Rob Packham, who is serving 22 years in jail for killing his wife Gill, has again approached the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) after it dismissed his application for leave to appeal his conviction in October.

Regional National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila confirmed on Monday that Packham had filed an application for the president of the SCA to possibly reconsider its initial decision.

"The State is opposing the application," said Ntabazalila.

According to a recent SCA notice, Packham was informed his application for leave to appeal was "dismissed on the grounds that there are no reasonable prospects of success and there is no other compelling reason why an appeal should be heard".

The case was considered by Justice Halima Salduker and Acting Justice Jannie Eksteen. The State had opposed that application.

On May 20, the Western Cape High Court found Packham guilty of killing his wife, Gill, and trying to defeat the ends of justice by setting her car and body alight in February 2018.

READ MORE: Constantia businessman Rob Packham sentenced to 22 years for killing wife

He applied for leave to appeal his conviction to the high court but Judge Elize Steyn dismissed it in July.

During his sentencing, she said Gill's murder was callous, brutal and shocking.

Judge Steyn added she must have suffered extreme shock and horror at realising what was happening. The degree of violence was also excessive and in the sanctity of her home, she said.

'Manifestly unjust'

Packham had based his SCA application on the police's "manifestly unjust" national photo identification system, which he charged was "startling in its application".

Taking aim at the evidence of State witnesses Paul Gray and Keanan Thomas, who testified they had seen Packham on the day he was found to have murdered Gill, he argued in court papers this was one of the many instances in which evidence "palpably unreliable or in conflict with the authoritative prescripts of the law" was found to have probative value in the case against him.

Gray, a 76-year-old neighbourhood watch member, told the court he had seen Packham in a green BMW in Lucius Way, Constantia, on February 22 last year. Packham had appeared anxious and banged his hands on the steering wheel, he said.

Thomas had seen Packham behind the wheel of a white Audi SUV as it drove away from Diep River train station as Gill's car went up in flames.

The man in the Audi appeared angry, Thomas said.

Gray and Thomas had identified Packham during a photo ID parade.

Packham, in his papers, argued the process was "significantly flawed" and characterised by a number of material irregularities.

Case law recognised such parades' significant shortcomings and stated a live line-up was preferred, he pointed out.

"It is all the more astonishing that the court finds this methodology in conducting the photo ID parade to be 'objective and procedurally fair' and 'not unfair to the accused'."

Packham could still petition the Constitutional Court as a last resort in an appeal attempt, but can only do so on constitutional grounds.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When a Covid-19 vaccine for under 16's becomes available, will you be taking your children to get it?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, immediately!
38% - 3225 votes
I'll wait to see how others respond
26% - 2219 votes
No, I don't think they need it
36% - 3111 votes
Vote
ZAR/USD
14.93
(+0.20)
ZAR/GBP
20.85
(+0.11)
ZAR/EUR
18.05
(+0.04)
ZAR/AUD
11.69
(-0.36)
ZAR/JPY
0.14
(+0.28)
Gold
1735.62
(+0.68)
Silver
26.71
(+0.85)
Platinum
1205.00
(+1.76)
Brent Crude
63.29
(-1.13)
Palladium
2358.52
(+1.10)
All Share
68510.75
(+1.44)
Top 40
63104.70
(+1.61)
Financial 15
12568.48
(+0.90)
Industrial 25
89150.72
(+1.21)
Resource 10
70539.82
(+2.28)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo