US Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to revive Trump's immigration rule

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Former US President Donald Trump.
Former US President Donald Trump.
Getty Images

The US Supreme Court on Monday rebuffed an effort by a group of Republican state officials to revive former President Donald Trump's hardline policy that barred certain immigrants deemed likely to require government benefits from gaining lawful permanent residency.

The justices turned away an appeal by 14 Republican state attorneys general, led by Ken Paxton of Texas, of a lower court ruling against their request to mount a legal defense of Trump's "public charge" rule after President Joe Biden's administration stopped defending the measure and later rescinded it.

The policy was put into effect by Trump's administration in February 2020 and ended by Biden's in March 2021.

Paxton was joined by attorneys general from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia.

Trump's administration in a 2019 rule significantly widened the definition of "public charges" who were ineligible for legal US permanent residency, or green cards. The expanded restriction applied to immigrants who receive a government benefit including the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor and food stamps for more than 12 months in any three-year period.

A federal judge in Illinois vacated the rule nationwide. The judge later rejected the Republican bid to intervene, saying the request by the state officials came too late, and the Chicago-based 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals last June agreed.

The Republican officials had told the justices that they should be able to defend Trump's rule, saying it has been estimated to save states collectively about $1 billion annually.

Biden's administration last September adopted a narrower rule under which immigrants would be deemed public charges only when they are likely to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, mirroring a 1999 regulation that had been in place for two decades. Texas on Thursday filed a separate federal lawsuit challenging Biden's rule.



We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 1291 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 7214 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 1501 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.03
+0.3%
Rand - Pound
20.80
+0.5%
Rand - Euro
18.55
+0.5%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.03
+0.6%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.3%
Platinum
1,023.39
+1.2%
Palladium
1,668.97
-0.0%
Gold
1,915.47
+0.2%
Silver
23.51
+0.2%
Brent Crude
82.17
-0.8%
Top 40
73,629
0.0%
All Share
79,802
0.0%
Resource 10
74,686
0.0%
Industrial 25
102,624
0.0%
Financial 15
16,551
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE