OPINION | Unbanning booze sales: Did we do it the right way?

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
A general view of consumers queuing to buy liquor at Spar Tops in Melville.
A general view of consumers queuing to buy liquor at Spar Tops in Melville.
Gallo Images/Martin de Kock
  • Buying alcohol is now legal and so is having a drink at your favourite pub.
  • In England, people are not allowed to stand at bars and drink, and pubs have to play music at a low volume so patrons don't have to shout, which increases the risk of coronavirus transmission.
  • In South Africa, there are no such rules in bars - only that people have to be home by 22:00 and venues can only host 50 people at a time.
  • Experts say we might need more regulations for the sale of alcohol, or we could see a second wave of infections.

Given the drop in pressure on hospitals from Covid-19 patients it is logical that the government has ended the ban on liquor sales as part of steps to reopen the economy.

LIVE | All the latest coronavirus and lockdown updates

The two interventions implemented on 13 July – the temporary ban on liquor sales and the curfew – did work in that trauma presentations at hospitals were reduced by more than a third in the Eastern Cape, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape, according to unpublished provincial government reports.

This was substantially more than the decrease that was predicted by a modelling study undertaken by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) at the beginning of July.

Current Level 2 regulations permit off-site consumption sales Mondays to Thursdays from 09:00 till 17:00 and on-site consumption sales until the 22:00 curfew seven days a week.

I have two concerns with the way in which the ban on liquor sales has been lifted.

First, the opening of on-site consumption liquor sales at bars, casinos, taverns and shebeens - even if only 50 people are allowed to gather - is worrying in terms of the risk for increasing community transmission of the coronavirus and reigniting a second wave of infections.

As Anthony Fauci, director of the United States government's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has been quoted as saying: "If you [are a high-risk area for Covid-19], you have a choice. You can either close the bars or close the schools."

We've done this, but will soon have reversed both. 

Many European countries with lower risks of infection than ours have now taken a tougher stance on opening bars. In Scotland, it is mandatory to provide table service. In general, guidance has been issued in the United Kingdom on measures that pubs and restaurants must take to keep customers and staff safe.

They include the option of ordering food on apps, music should be kept at a low volume to avoid people needing to shout, which increases the risk of transmission, pub-goers are encouraged to book tables in advance, and live gigs and standing at the bar will not be allowed.

South Africa is opening up alcohol sales without any such regulations.

I would have liked to see on-site consumption sales limited to restaurants serving a meal up to a specified amount. In Ireland, the threshold for such meals is €9.

My second concern is that we are likely to see an even bigger surge in alcohol-related trauma admissions and non-natural deaths than when alcohol sales resumed at the start of Level 3, because we now have on-site consumption outlets selling alcohol seven days a week until 22:00.

Simply telling people to drink moderately and responsibly is not going to be enough, we've seen in various research studies.

I was disappointed that the president didn't announce more stringent regulatory controls on alcohol to curtail the likelihood of heavy drinking and alcohol-related trauma cases at hospitals when he made the announcement to lift the ban on liquor sales in South Africa again.

Measures proposed to government by the SAMRC prior to the president's announcement on Saturday include:

Putting a limit on how much alcohol can be bought from alcohol-selling outlets to prevent on-trading by unlicensed outlets;

Requiring ID checks for anyone purchasing alcohol, preventing the sale of alcohol in larger containers than the following: 500ml for beer and cider and 750ml for wine and spirits;

Immediately lowering the maximum blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels for drivers to 0.02g of absolute alcohol per 100ml of blood – the current BAC level is 0.05g per 100ml of blood;

Banning all alcohol advertising, except at points of sale;

Not allowing outlets to have special offers or promotions during Level 2 of the lockdown.

Disaster management regulations alone, however, were never going to be a long-term fix for the problem of heavy alcohol use in South Africa, where, according to the World Health Organisation, 59% of drinkers engage in heavy episodic (binge) drinking. We also have the dubious honour of having the world's 6th highest level of absolute alcohol consumed per drinker per day.

The consequences of these drinking patterns are high levels of trauma and non-natural deaths – and the costs that go along with it.

An underlying challenge is that parts of the alcohol industry in South Africa depend on heavy drinking to make the profits they have become used to making.

The government and Parliament now need to look at revising and passing the stalled 2016 Liquor Amendment Bill, which aims to better regulate the marketing of alcohol products to reduce exposure to minors, raise the drinking age to 21 and disallow the granting of liquor licences to premises at petrol stations, near public transport facilities, within 500 metres of schools, places of worship or substance abuse treatment centres.

The 2020 Road Traffic Amendment Bill, which aims to reduce the maximum BAC levels for drivers to zero, also needs to be approved and implemented.

Moreover, the stalled state needs to revisit the 2013 Control of Marketing of Alcoholic Beverages Bill as part of a package of measures to turn things around. This bill aims to prohibit the marketing of alcoholic beverages (except at points of sale), any sponsorship associated with alcoholic beverages and the promotion of alcoholic beverages.

At a provincial level, the Western Cape needs to take the Alcohol Harm Reduction White Paper, which was approved by the provincial Cabinet in 2017, to the provincial legislature.

This paper, among other things, aims to bring responsible unlicensed liquor outlets into the regulated space in a sustainable manner.

The paper also seeks to identify mechanisms and criteria that will enable the rezoning of outlets for liquor sales in appropriate residential areas.

But to have a meaningful impact on heavy drinking, South Africa needs to go beyond these legislative interventions and also consider measures that increase prices. One example would be to increase the price of alcohol through equalising taxation across alcoholic beverages, according to absolute alcohol content – in other words, the more alcohol a beverage contains, the higher that tax on the product would be.

Other potential interventions include instituting minimum unit pricing, for example, R8 per standard unit of alcohol (12g of 15ml of absolute alcohol), and to improve the labelling of alcohol containers by requiring the placement of standard alcohol units and calories.

Warnings on beverage containers about the dangers of alcohol, such as drinking during pregnancy, can also be improved and a track and tracing system can be implemented whereby it will be possible to track products back to the source that sold it.

This will help to reduce the sale of alcohol products by unlicensed outlets and to identify counterfeit products and concoctions.

Lastly, making alcohol-related trauma, such as people being injured due to drunk driving or alcohol-related violence, a notifiable condition by using clinical assessment tools, will serve as a barometer of the effectiveness of the implementation of national efforts to reduce the harmful use of alcohol, and especially the burden incurred by the health sector.

Most of these measures are in line with the package of evidenced-based interventions launched by the World Health Organisation about two years ago.

Not implementing effective regulatory controls on alcohol during Level 2 of the lockdown raises the risk of increasing community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 - the virus that causes Covid-19 - and worsens the burden on our health services. The former will not only increase the risk of negative outcomes for people infected, but will also prolong the lockdown.

If we don't take more seriously the need to use effective measures to curtail heavy drinking and facilitate a safer drinking environment going forward, these problems will continue to plague us.

Charles Parry is the director of the SAMRC’s Alcohol, Tobacco & Other Drugs Research Unit and an extraordinary professor in the department of psychiatry at Stellenbosch University. Follow him on Twitter @profparry.

This story was produced by the Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism. Sign up for the newsletter.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
Voting Booth
When assisting your child with remote learning this year, did you:
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Follow the school's comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) curriculum?
13% - 231 votes
Adjust the CSE curriculum to suit the family's morals?
24% - 418 votes
Ignore the schools CSE programme and do your own teaching?
63% - 1106 votes
Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo