Australia harpoons Japan's whaling

Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida after a cabinet meeting at his office in Tokyo.
Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida after a cabinet meeting at his office in Tokyo.
Yoshikazu Tsuno, AFP

The Hague - Japan's annual hunt for hundreds of whales in the Antarctic is nothing more than business disguised as science, Australia told the UN's highest court on Wednesday at the start of hearings in the emotionally-charged case.

Canberra argued before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague that Japan is exploiting a loophole by continuing to hunt whales as scientific research in spite of a 1986 International Whaling Commission ban on commercial whaling.

"Japan seeks to cloak its commercial whaling under the lab coat of science," one of Australia's lawyers in the case, Bill Campbell, told the court in a case that activists say is crucial for the giant marine mammals' future.

"It simply isn't science," Campbell said, stressing Australia's otherwise "excellent" relationship with Japan.

Canberra took Tokyo to court in 2010, saying that more than 10 000 whales have been killed since 1988 as a result of Japan's JARPA and JARPA II research programmes, allegedly putting the Asian nation in breach of international conventions and its obligation to preserve marine mammals and their environment.

While Norway and Iceland have whaling programmes in spite of the 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling agreed through the International Whaling Commission (IWC), Japan exploits a loophole that allows lethal scientific research, Canberra said.

In its application, Australia accuses Japan of breaching its obligation to "observe in good faith the zero catch limit in relation to the killing of whales".

Deputy Foreign Minister Koji Tsuruoka told the court that "Australia's claim is invalid. Japan's research whaling has been conducted for scientific research in accordance with international law".

Japan is "proud of its tradition of living in harmony with nature, and utilising living resources while respecting their sustainability", he said.

The annual whale hunt has long drawn criticism worldwide, but Tokyo said it would robustly defend the practice that also puts whale meat on dinner plates back home.

Tokyo says the research is conducted to "better understand the sustainability of whale stocks" and it does not exclude a push for commercial whale hunting to be authorised in the future.

"The Australian arguments are baseless. We are going to present how we conduct whaling based on science," Japanese delegation spokesperson Noriyuki Shikata told journalists.

"It is not commercial whaling at all, the Japanese programme is based on science," he said.

Japan says that the number of minke whales it hunts is much less than their birth rate and is therefore sustainable.

But John Frizell of environmental lobby group Greenpeace told AFP that the case is "about the legality of the programme, so the number of whales they hunt is irrelevant".

The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), which has long campaigned for an end to whaling, said the case would have implications for "future compliance with all multilateral environmental agreements".

"Commercial whaling, whether conducted openly or under the guise of science, is a cruel and outdated practice which produces no science of value," Patrick Ramage, who heads the IFAW's Global Whale Programme, said in a statement.

"Japanese taxpayers are being forced to subsidise an industry that is dying in the water and the marketplace in the 21st century."

Militant anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd, which will have observers at the ICJ, said it was a make-or-break case for the sea mammals.

"If nothing happens now, nothing else is going to happen," Geert Vons, the group's director in the Netherlands, told AFP.

"It's good that public opinion in Australia is so strong that politicians have decided to do something," Vons said.

"Antarctica is the last really wild continent, it must be protected".

Japan will begin addressing the court on Tuesday, with hearings to last until 16 July. New Zealand is supporting Australia's case and will also be making a submission.

A ruling is not expected for several months.

Established in 1945, the ICJ is the UN's highest judicial body and settles disputes between nation states. It is the only one of five principal UN bodies not located in New York.

Lockdown For
Voting Booth
The rumour mill is rife that SA's Super Rugby franchises will play in an expanded PRO16 in Europe. Should SA Rugby look to head north?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Yes, it makes sense logistically
34% - 912 votes
No, not playing the Kiwi teams regularly equals self-destruction
22% - 598 votes
SA Rugby needs teams in both hemispheres
43% - 1159 votes
Brent Crude
All Share
Top 40
Financial 15
Industrial 25
Resource 10
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo