Land reform in South Africa has collapsed not because of the absence of an overarching enabling constitutional framework, but despite it. Changing that framework doesn't guarantee access to land, nor does implementing state curatorship, writes Tembeka Ngcukaitobi.
A few weeks ago, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced yet another land scheme - some black farmers in Groblersdal, Limpopo were granted title deeds. Expectedly, the government's spokespeople touted this as a breakthrough, an affirmation of the success of the state's land reform programme, "the return of the land to its rightful owners". Obviously, this is progress - some people who previously had no ownership of the farms they occupied and worked on now do. This matters. Yet, the claim that the allocation of 32 title deeds to a few farmers will finally usher in "redress, justice and social cohesion" is a gross overstatement.
There are broader implications of Ramaphosa's announcement that call for examination.