LETTER TO THE EDITOR | Why the DA needs to make a U-turn

0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen. Picture: Ziyaad Douglas / Gallo Images
Democratic Alliance (DA) leader John Steenhuisen. Picture: Ziyaad Douglas / Gallo Images

Rejecting multiracialism in one of the world's most multiracial countries could possibly have been a mistake for the DA, as this week's by-election results show, writes David Gant. 


Notwithstanding the low turnout and the geographical locations of this week's by-elections, and their possible irrelevance in terms of next year's national local elections outcome, the performance of the DA has probably left its loyal supporters dejected, disappointed and depressed.

Even though they may recognise that it would be unwise to over-interpret the results, the message they are getting is that the DA was the biggest loser and no amount of spin and tweets from the federal chairperson or other party spokesperson can change that perception.

Sadly, the fact is that it was all too predictable.

Senior public representatives of the DA, including their undoubtedly capable and erudite leader, John Steenhuisen, have recently been publicly promoting the, evidently new, inclusion of "non-racialism" in the DA's values and principles proposition. This is confusing because the DA and its predecessors have always rejected racism and racialism as part of their fundamental philosophy.

What really is new from the DA is that it has turned its back on and refuses to recognise "multiracialism", and that has projected it, rightly or wrongly, as a race denialist political establishment.

It does not necessarily follow that the loss of black and coloured votes is a result of the DA's stance and the perception it has created that racial groups do not exist or do not matter in our country, but it seems highly probable.

With a governing party that is battered and tattered with corruption and incompetence, it should not be that difficult for the DA to take its rightful place as the appropriate party to replace it, but it will not do that if there is a fatal flaw in the way its message of rejection of multiracialism is being perceived by the electorate.

As the saying goes: "It is not always what you say that counts, but how it lands." 

To be seen to reject multiracialism in one of the world's most multiracial countries could possibly be a crash landing for the party.

Our country cannot afford this and the DA should consider a U-turn on the matter.

- David Gant, Kenilworth.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When assisting your child with remote learning this year, did you:
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Follow the school's comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) curriculum?
14% - 61 votes
Adjust the CSE curriculum to suit the family's morals?
26% - 117 votes
Ignore the schools CSE programme and do your own teaching?
61% - 273 votes
Vote
ZAR/USD
15.27
(-0.48)
ZAR/GBP
20.38
(-0.37)
ZAR/EUR
18.23
(-0.65)
ZAR/AUD
11.28
(-0.81)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(-0.53)
Gold
1773.90
(-1.90)
Silver
22.35
(-3.56)
Platinum
945.00
(-1.38)
Brent Crude
47.75
(-1.52)
Palladium
2345.50
(-0.93)
All Share
57792.78
(-0.23)
Top 40
52983.96
(-0.19)
Financial 15
11653.77
(+0.07)
Industrial 25
79863.67
(-0.16)
Resource 10
52561.62
(-0.43)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo