Mkhwebane wants to appeal ruling which prevents her from returning to office

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane at her impeachment hearing.
Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane at her impeachment hearing.
PHOTO: Jan Gerber/News24
  • Busisiwe Mkhwebane asked the court for leave to appeal to the SCA a ruling that prevented her from returning to office.
  • Mkhwebane asked the court to enforce its order overturning Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to suspend her.
  • The full bench said the order to overturn Ramaphosa's decision to suspend must first be confirmed by the Constitutional Court.  

Suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane will ask the Western Cape High Court for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) the ruling that effectively keeps her from returning to office.

On Tuesday, Judges Lister Nuku, Matthew Francis and James Lekhuleni handed down a judgment, which confirmed that the Constitutional Court must first confirm their order to overturn Mkhwebane's suspension before it takes effect.

On 9 September, the same judges ruled that President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to suspend Mkhwebane, a day after she announced her office would investigate him in terms of the Executive Members Ethics Act complaint over the 2020 break-in at his Phala Phala farm, and a day before the Western Cape High Court ruled on Mkhwebane's attempt to interdict such a move, was improper.

The court stated: 

In our view, the hurried nature of the suspension of [Mkhwebane] in the circumstances, notwithstanding that a judgment of the full court was looming on the same subject matter, leads this court to an ineluctable conclusion that the suspension may have been retaliatory and, hence, unlawful.

After the DA launched an application to appeal that ruling to the Constitutional Court, thereby immediately suspending it, Mkhwebane brought an application for its immediate enforcement – which both the DA and Ramaphosa opposed.

READ | 'Long on sophistry, short on legal authority': High Court slams Mkhwebane's bid to return to work

The full bench dismissed this application in Tuesday's judgment and ordered Mkhwebane to pay most of the DA's legal costs.

The court agreed with both the DA and Ramaphosa that the president's decision to suspend Mkhwebane had to be referred to the Constitutional Court for confirmation "independent of any steps taken by any of the parties" – and, as such, that the law governing the immediate enforcement of orders "has no application" in this case.

The bench said advocate Dali Mpofu SC's arguments on behalf of Mkhwebane "misstates the law and is a gross mischaracterisation of the reasons underpinning the court's finding in this regard".

"One would normally expect that, having identified the issues to be determined, the parties will be aware when a dispute entails a declaration of constitutional invalidity that requires confirmation by the Constitutional Court," the judges stated in their ruling. "But, perhaps, this places too much reliance on the parties to apply their common sense."

This is the ruling Mkhwebane now wants to challenge at the SCA.

The spokesperson for the Jacob Zuma Foundation, Mzwanele Manyi, tweeted the covering page of Mkhwebane's urgent notice to apply for leave to appeal. 

Mkhwebane's intended appeal comes somewhat as a surprise, as the Constitutional Court is set to hear the matter next month. 



We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 1279 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 7147 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 1484 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.08
-0.2%
Rand - Pound
20.91
+0.9%
Rand - Euro
18.65
+0.5%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.10
+0.6%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.4%
Platinum
1,020.69
+0.9%
Palladium
1,651.58
-1.1%
Gold
1,912.75
-1.9%
Silver
23.45
-2.2%
Brent Crude
82.84
-3.2%
Top 40
73,629
-0.1%
All Share
79,802
-0.0%
Resource 10
74,686
-0.6%
Industrial 25
102,624
+0.1%
Financial 15
16,551
-0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE