Feedback on cell tower concerns

accreditation
Residents object the cell tower erection.  Photo: supplied
Residents object the cell tower erection. Photo: supplied

SUBSEQUENT to last week’s article in Hillcrest Fever regarding the objection by residents of Forest Hills against the erection of a 30m high cellular tower with plans for a 12m squared base along Forest Hills, scores of concerned residents and companies have come out in their numbers to support the cause.

An immediate neighbour said she was unaware that a tower was to be constructed next door to her home.
“As immediate neighbours I would think that they would need to get permission first before even getting to the stage where it is now.

“I have three children and both my parents passed away from cancer. There is not enough conclusive evidence to prove that these towers are harmless.

“Even if the radiation rumours are not true, this is what the public believes. Which means that not only our house, but all the houses in our beautiful area will devaluate, because of the perceived belief that it will make you sick. “We moved here because it is such a beautiful, peaceful, quiet, safe neighbourhood surrounded by nature - all these things will go out the door when that tower gets built. “Apparently as it stands now, there will be six containers as well as generators, which will be an eyesore and extremely noisy.”

Francois Sanson, Head of Site Acquisition of ATC South Africa, the company responsible for the construction said: “Please note that we take health concerns raised very seriously. Not only do we have an internal health and safety division that continuously monitors all our sites for safety, health and environmental issues, we also use independent companies and experts to ensure compliance with international, national and local requirements.

“In this regard, we support and ensure conformance with the requirements of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines as endorsed by the Department of Health, in order to assure there is no RF hazard for the public.
“This is typically achieved by placing antennas at a sufficient height, pattern and power levels so as not to induce any hazard to the public,” he said.

In respect of Ms Grobler’s sale of property Sanson said: “We cannot comment on the details of a private property transaction.

“We are required to abide by the applicable legislation that governs the erection of telecommunication towers. The procedure in respect of public participation is regulated by local legislation and we would encourage any persons that are concerned with that process to raise their particular concerns with their local municipal council,” he said.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Do you think South Africa needs tighter restrictions to combat the third wave?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the situation is grim and needs serious measures
27% - 1008 votes
No, we cannot afford more lockdowns
34% - 1298 votes
Yes, but only in provinces where it is out of control
39% - 1479 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
14.27
-0.3%
Rand - Pound
19.90
-0.3%
Rand - Euro
17.04
-0.4%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.77
-0.4%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.1%
Gold
1,778.02
-0.3%
Silver
25.81
-0.5%
Palladium
2,565.00
-0.7%
Platinum
1,082.50
+2.4%
Brent Crude
74.90
+1.9%
Top 40
59,494
+0.0%
All Share
65,552
-0.0%
Resource 10
61,934
+1.3%
Industrial 25
87,234
-0.8%
Financial 15
12,834
-0.3%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo