EAAB lawsuit: Court orders CEO to provide DA MP with documents as requested

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
A DA MP has scored a court victory.
A DA MP has scored a court victory.
  • The CEO of the EAAB, Mamodupi Mohlala-Mulaudzi, filed for a R1.5m defamation suit against DA MP Emma Powell.
  • Powell posted a tweet in December 2019, saying the CEO had gone "rogue." 
  • A Western Cape court says Mohlala-Mulaudzi should hand over documents requested by Powell within 10 days. 

The Western Cape High Court has given Mamodupi Mohlala-Mulaudzi, chief executive officer of the Estate Agency Affairs Board (EAAB), 10 days to hand over documents to DA MP Emma Powell.

Should she fail to make the documents available, then Powell can apply for an order to dismiss Mohlala-Mulaudzi's defamation claim, the court ruled. 

Mohlala-Mulaudzi has filed a R1.5 million defamation suit against Powell following a tweet, which suggested the CEO had gone "rogue".

The tweet read: "Today, a meeting between EAAB management and NEHAWU shop stewards was terminated when increasingly rogue CEO Mohlala-Mulaudzi's husband/partner allegedly walked onto state entity's premises and produced a firearm."

READ | EFF's Paulsen, DA's Van Damme kicked out of the National Assembly

Powell admitted to posting the tweet, but said it was not defamatory.

She said the tweet was not published with malice, adding it was for the public benefit.

Powell also contends the tweet may very well be described as accurate and fair, in that Mohlala-Mulaudzi received two salary payments from two governmental enterprises simultaneously.

The high court ruled on Friday that Mohlala-Mulaudzi should hand over the documents required by Powell.

The documents include:

  • the minutes of every meeting of the board of directors of EAAB since Mohlala-Mulaudzi's appointment as CEO;
  • all written complaints relating to her conduct as CEO from members of the board of directors of EAAB, employees, or any other person affiliated with the board of directors;
  • a complaint written by Eugenia Kula-Ameyaw in October 2019 to Minister Lindiwe Sisulu;
  • a complaint written by Tumisho Motsepe; and 
  • all letters of complaint directed at her.

The judge also said Mohlala-Mulaudzi should provide all her salary slips or proof of payment of board fees or any other fees or emoluments paid to her by the South African Broadcasting Corporation while she was EAAB CEO.

She should also furnish all court papers on her action against Kula-Ameyaw for defamation, arising from a letter Kula-Ameyaw wrote to the Minister of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation, Lindiwe Sisulu, in October 2019, including the summons and particulars of claim, the plea, and any further pleadings.

Kula-Ameyaw reportedly painted a bleak picture of the state of affairs at the organisation since Mohlala-Mulaudzi took over.

In 2019, City Press reported that Mohlala-Mulaudzi faced battles on multiple fronts with her colleagues, the public broadcaster and the government, who raised questions about her conduct. Staff also accused her of bullying and arbitrary cutting benefits.

In court papers, Mohlala-Mulaudzi said the documents about her conduct in her position are irrelevant to her action because she instituted the action in her personal capacity

READ| 'I'm a patriot, not a trouble maker', says firebrand SABC candidate

But Judge Derek Wille disagreed.

"… At issue is not the capacity in which the plaintiff [Mohlala-Mulaudzi] is suing the defendant [Powell], but, rather, the enquiry is whether the tweet is true or fair comment, taking into account the context of the tweet, together with the factual position that the plaintiff was the CEO of the EAAB.

"Further, the plaintiff claims that the documents sought are not relevant because the defendant only became aware of these documents subsequent to the institution of proceedings.

"Thus, it is argued that this information would not have been in her knowledge at the time of making the defamatory comments and therefore cannot assist the defendant in her defence.

"Again, I disagree because, in relation to the defence of truth, all that matters is whether the tweet was objectively substantially true and published to the benefit of the public," the judge said. 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Zama zama crackdown: What are your thoughts on West Village residents taking the law into their own hands?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Authorities should bring in the army already
10% - 938 votes
Illegal miners can't be scapegoated for all crime
53% - 5242 votes
What else did we expect without no proper policing
34% - 3308 votes
Vigilante groups are also part of the problem
3% - 322 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.