God must destroy 'mark of the beast' Covid-19 vaccines - Mogoeng defends his controversial prayer

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
  • Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng has defended his controversial prayer about Covid-19 vaccines that are "of the devil".
  • Mogoeng said, if there is any vaccine manufactured to advance a "satanic agenda", God must destroy it.
  • He said it was his constitutional right to express his religious beliefs and others had the right to disagree with him.

Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng has defended his controversial prayer that any Covid-19 vaccine that was "of the devil" be destroyed.

"I lock out any vaccine that is not of you," he said on Thursday, during a closing prayer.

He said: 

If there be any vaccine that is of the devil, meant to infuse triple-six in the lives of people, meant to corrupt their DNA, any such vaccine, Lord God Almighty, may it be destroyed by fire, in the name of Jesus.

Mogoeng was speaking during a thanksgiving ceremony at Tembisa Hospital, which was also televised by SABC.

On Friday, Mogoeng was holding a media briefing to unpack the 2019/20 Judiciary Annual Report, but was instead peppered with questions about his views on vaccines and the social media fallout following his prayer.

An irate Mogoeng said he didn't follow trends on Twitter.

"I honestly pay very little attention to the media. I don't know if people honestly misunderstood what I said, or deliberately misunderstood what I said."

'God must destroy it'

"I said, if there is any vaccine manufactured to advance a satanic agenda, of the mark of the beast, 666, or if there is any vaccine manufactured for the purpose of corrupting the DNA of people – that vaccine must be burnt. God must intervene and destroy it!" Mogoeng said.

"If people are supporting a satanic agenda, they must tell us why. If they want us to have the 666 mark, they must tell us why."

Mogoeng said he acknowledges that "not all vaccines advance that agenda".

He further described himself as an independent thinker who didn't need affirmation and who had the right to freely express himself.

He said: 

Prayer is controversial in South Africa. I'm not going to be begging for permission to pray – never. It's my constitutional right; I'm a Christian and I'm not going to be hypocritical.

Mogoeng said there was no reason his judicial responsibilities should be separated from his religious beliefs.

In terms of the vaccine, Mogoeng said he was not "asserting it as a fact" that a "666 vaccine" exists.

"But if there is [such a] vaccine, I don't want it. This is the end times according to us Christians. If there is any 666 vaccine, I want God to destroy it."

He added that if there was any "clean" vaccine, "they must produce it quickly because people need it".

South Africans aren't idiots

Mogoeng said South Africans were "not idiots" and would not accept anything he says just because it's in the public domain.

He said: 

My prayer was meant to touch every well-meaning Christian to pray to God and say, if there is any vaccine that will negatively affect people's lives, that vaccine must never see the light of day. So, people must pray against that.

Mogoeng said people were intelligent enough to separate fact from fiction and didn't need to accept everything he said.

"I'm not a scientist, I'm a prayer warrior."

Judicial complaint against Mogoeng

The human rights organisation #Africa4Palestine blasted Mogoeng's comments, saying it intended to lay a complaint with the Judicial Services Commission (JSC).

"We believe that the Chief Justice's latest comments undermine medical science and South Africa's position on the distribution of vaccines," the organisation said in a statement on Friday.

The organisation said: 

By terming certain vaccines as '666' or the 'devil's vaccines', [Mogoeng] is undermining not only medical science, but also contradicting our government's position on vaccines.

"We are confident that such outlandish fanatic speech and denial of medical science during a pandemic is a violation the JSC's Code of Conduct which explicitly urges judges to refrain from such controversies.

"While we acknowledge Justice Mogoeng's previous judgments and the important role that he has played in our judiciary, we are of the firm opinion that his position asks of him to uphold international law, respect medical science, not interfere in South Africa's national and international relations as well as health policies."

Did you know you can comment on this article? Subscribe to News24 and add your voice to the conversation.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
Voting Booth
Matric results are out! Are you happy with your child's result?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
No, the pandemic really messed up their ability to focus
34% - 72 votes
Yes, they did well given the circumstances
66% - 141 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.