'His continued incarceration is unlawful' - Lawyer of Zim businessman calls for speedy bail hearing

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
A Zimbabwean businessman was arrested last week by Interpol South Africa.
A Zimbabwean businessman was arrested last week by Interpol South Africa.
Getty/Caspar Benson
  • Zimbabwean businessman Frank Buyanga Sadiqi was arrested last week by Interpol South Africa. 
  • The Zimbabwean court cancelled his warrant of arrest on Monday.
  • On Thursday, Sadiqi's lawyers called for a speedy bail hearing in the Randburg Magistrate's Court.

The lawyer representing businessman Frank Buyanga Sadiqi, who was detained by Interpol South Africa in Sandton last week, has called for a speedy bail hearing for his client.

Laurence Hodes SC told the Randburg Magistrate's Court that Sadiqi was entitled to bail.

Hodes added that the warrant Interpol executed to arrest Sadiqi on 10 November had been cancelled in Zimbabwe.

"The South African state is aware of that. We are only awaiting confirmation from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco). The matter has attracted local and international news organisations.

"His continued incarceration is unlawful. We have an authentic court order from Zimbabwe, showing the cancellation of his warrant of arrest," Hodes told the court.

Sadiqi was wanted in Zimbabwe on charges of kidnapping and robbery as well as three counts of contempt of court, News24 earlier reported. 

READ | Zim businessman says SARS is trying to drive him out of SA after R600m in goods allegedly seized

In a statement, police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe said Sadiqi had allegedly kidnapped his son and brought him to South Africa.

Mathe said:

A warrant of arrest was immediately issued by Zimbabwean authorities, after which Interpol Harare also issued a red notice.

On Thursday, Hodes claimed he handed over documents, including Sadiqi's passport, to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). Hodes said Sadiqi owned property in South Africa.

"We have attached his proof of visa permits to our affidavit. These would assist in showing he is not a flight risk and is entitled to bail. The accused is applying to have custody of his child in South Africa.

"There is [a court] order in Zimbabwe that his child is in his custody. The High Court in Johannesburg is determining which parent would be given custody of his 8-year-old son.

"There is no basis to detain him. He was arrested at the address we had submitted. I am ready to proceed with the bail application. 

"Should the State decide to proceed with the bail [application], we are ready. If there is no warrant, he should be released," Hodes added.

READ | Hawks, Interpol arrest 2 men in Pretoria for online romance scam, will seek extradition to US

"The chief magistrate in Zimbabwe sent an email to DPP in SA that the warrant has been cancelled. The only document that gives this court jurisdiction to hear the matter is a warrant of arrest.

"Absent to that, there is no basis for his detention. The extradition of a person is done based on the commitment between two states working together. We are dealing here with a person's liberty," Hodes argued.

Prosecutor advocate Rutondo Phungo argued that the State had to authenticate the documents they had received from the defence before the bail application could begin.

Phungo said:

His passport needs to be verified by home affairs. Other documents, including the warrant of arrest, must be verified by relevant local departments. We are not ready to proceed. We know bail is a matter of urgency.

"Those documents were provided today, not on 12 November as was expected. We acknowledged the receipt of the warrant. The court should bear in mind that these matters involve Dirco. 

"Dirco will assist in authenticating all documents we have received. The only channel of communication between South Africa and Zimbabwe is through Dirco. Without them giving us instructions, we cannot authenticate their court orders."

Phungo said it was strange that a Zimbabwean court communicated with the defence instead of the NPA.

"They should have sent the documents to our offices requesting us not to proceed with our prosecution. We need to get the authentication and validity of the court order.

"We believe that Zimbabwe should have made means to inform us about the cancellation of the court order. When we receive such, we will decide. We are still proceeding with the extradition process, as our government had requested.

"There are reasons why such matters should go via Dirco and our justice department. We have requested Dirco to communicate with Zimbabwe to expedite the matter. Interpol also assists in obtaining authentic documents. They are communicating with Zimbabwe."

The matter was postponed to 22 November for verification of the Zimbabwean court order and other documents. 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 1421 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 7848 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 1621 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.