'I demand an acquittal': Zuma says State cannot present corruption evidence against him

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Former president Jacob Zuma.
Former president Jacob Zuma.
Thulie Dlamini, Gallo Images

Former president Jacob Zuma has demanded that he be acquitted of arms deal corruption - without ever facing trial - because the State has "lost the constitutional legitimacy to present the evidence against me".

Zuma was responding to arguments by lead prosecutor Billy Downer, who says the former president's efforts to seek acquittal through a so-called "special plea" process are legally ludicrous.

This, Downer said, is because special pleas are used to attack the "title" of an advocate to prosecute a case and, in any event, can only result in the removal of the prosecutor.

READ | I got innocent donations and no one expected anything from me: Inside Zuma's 'not guilty' plea

There is no legal precedent for them resulting in the acquittal of an accused person.

In papers filed at the KwaZulu-Natal High Court in Pietermaritzburg, Zuma is however adamant that the State's alleged "loss of constitutional legitimacy" has fundamentally violated his fair trial rights - an apparent repetition of his failed arguments to secure a permanent stay of his prosecution.

"I must therefore be acquitted because there is no evidence that the State may lawfully present in a court for me to answer as a consequence of the State losing title to prosecute," Zuma says.

According to Zuma, Downer's lack of title is not connected to his lawful delegation to prosecute the case against him, but rather his alleged lack of independence and impartiality.

He insists that Downer is "hell bent" on pursuing him for racketeering and corruption linked to South Africa's multibillion rand arms deal.

Zuma stands accused of receiving over R4 million in bribes and benefits from his former financial advisor Schabir Shaik, who was convicted of arranging a R500 000 a year bribe for the then-deputy president from French arms company Thales, in exchange for his "protection" from any potential investigation into the arms deal.

He has previously repeatedly claimed that his prosecution was fatally tainted by political interference and undue delay, but these allegations have been rejected by the courts.

This is a developing story.

Do you want to know more about this topic? Sign up for one of News24's 33 newsletters to receive the information you want in your inbox. Special newsletters are available to subscribers.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When it comes to gun control, South Africa needs:
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Stricter laws to control gun ownership
28% - 414 votes
To allow citizens to make their own choices
72% - 1090 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
14.07
+0.8%
Rand - Pound
19.57
+1.1%
Rand - Euro
16.82
+0.8%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.69
+0.8%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.8%
Gold
1,783.30
+0.5%
Silver
26.16
+0.9%
Palladium
2,622.01
-1.0%
Platinum
1,106.50
+0.6%
Brent Crude
75.56
+0.5%
Top 40
60,014
-0.3%
All Share
66,102
-0.2%
Resource 10
63,752
+0.1%
Industrial 25
86,417
-0.8%
Financial 15
13,067
+0.4%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE