Mkhwebane: 'There is a threat to remove me from office under the pretext that I am incompetent'

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. (Felix Dlangamandla, Gallo Images, Netwerk24, file)
Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. (Felix Dlangamandla, Gallo Images, Netwerk24, file)

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane says she has been on the defensive against unwarranted attacks since taking office in October 2016.

Mkhwebane was addressing the student chapter of the Black Lawyers Association at the University of South Africa on Thursday.

She believed she was under attack for daring to "touch those who are seen by some as paragons of virtue".  

"Now there is a threat to remove me from office under the pretext that I am incompetent. The argument is that some of my reports have been set aside by the courts."

Recently, the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled Mkhwebane should pay costs in a case relating to her investigation into the multimillion-rand Estina dairy farm scandal.

She has also been labelled "dishonest" by the Constitutional Court.

But Mkhwebane said if a Public Protector was removed because a court had set aside its report, then judges should be removed from the bench because an appellate court had set their ruling aside.

"But, as a woman leader, what do you do when faced with such challenges?

"A responsibility like the one I am entrusted with requires one to develop a very thick skin. I am not going to allow any distractions. I am focused on taking the services of this office to the grassroots."

News24 earlier reported the portfolio committee on justice and correctional services had unanimously decided to refer the matter of an inquiry into Mkhwebane's suitability as Public Protector to the rules committee.

This committee will be asked to draft rules that would serve as a guideline for the removal of any Chapter 9 institution's head, such as the Public Protector.

The ANC study group on justice welcomed the decision.

A statement from ANC MP Hishaam Mohamed, the ANC's whip on the committee, said: "Currently, Section 194[1] of the Constitution provides for the removal of the Public Protector on the grounds of misconduct, incapacity or incompetence.

"The Constitution also states that should a committee in the National Assembly find such an adverse finding against the Public Protector, then the incumbent would be removed from the Chapter 9 institution."  

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Will you continue to use WhatsApp following the company announcing a change terms of service which would force users to share personal data?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, the terms of service do not bother me enough to switch
52% - 7604 votes
No, I will be switching over to a new service
44% - 6353 votes
I've never used WhatsApp
4% - 584 votes
Vote
ZAR/USD
15.15
(+0.41)
ZAR/GBP
20.59
(+0.34)
ZAR/EUR
18.30
(+0.36)
ZAR/AUD
11.64
(+0.52)
ZAR/JPY
0.15
(+0.19)
Gold
1837.61
(+1.35)
Silver
24.95
(+2.37)
Platinum
1083.00
(+1.97)
Brent Crude
54.79
(0.00)
Palladium
2365.01
(+0.05)
All Share
63713.87
(+0.26)
Top 40
58548.17
(+0.17)
Financial 15
11904.46
(-0.10)
Industrial 25
84813.75
(+1.20)
Resource 10
63219.33
(-1.00)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo