Parliament distances itself from resolution condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
The South African parliamentary delegation to the 144th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.
The South African parliamentary delegation to the 144th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.
@ParliamentofRSA
  • South Africa has distanced itself from a resolution condemning Russia's use of force against Ukraine.
  • South Africa's delegation to the Inter-Parliamentary Union was one of nine countries to reject the motion.
  • The facts don't matter, said one of South Africa's delegates, EFF chief whip Floyd Shivambu. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin can continue to count on South Africa as one of the few countries refusing to condemn his deadly invasion of Ukraine.

In the latest instance, a delegation from the South African Parliament on Wednesday distanced itself from an international resolution stating that "the ongoing Russian use of force against Ukraine is a violation of the Charter of the United Nations, including the principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity".

The Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), at its Assembly in Nusa Dua, Indonesia, adopted a resolution for the peaceful resolution of the war in Ukraine, respecting international law, the Charter of the United Nations and territorial integrity.

The resolution notes with concern that the war in Ukraine threatens global security, with potential global economic uncertainties in the future.

It calls on all IPU Member Parliaments to support efforts to deescalate tensions, reads a statement from the IPU.

It appeals to MPs from the Russian Federation and Ukraine, both IPU Members, "to promote initiatives to cease hostilities and resolve differences through peaceful, diplomatic means".

A firefighter extinguishes a burning house hit by
A firefighter extinguishes a burning house hit by Russian Grad rockets in Kyiv's Shevchenkivsky district, on March 22, 2022.
AFP ARIS MESSINIS / AFP

The resolution notes that, "on 24 February 2022, the Russian Federation launched a full-scale military attack invading the sovereign nation of Ukraine and its people".

It further expresses grave concern about "the threat to global peace and security posed by the decision to order Russian nuclear forces onto a special regime of operation and a 'high alert' level of readiness, and noting the urgency for the Russian Federation to withdraw this threat and refrain from making such threats".

The resolution also notes that "the Russian Federation has committed an act of aggression that may constitute a violation of a fundamental rule of international law".

READ | Russia-Ukraine: Speaker Mapisa-Nqakula toes the party line at international event

According to the IPU, the resolution is strong in placing the IPU as a potential platform for peace through mechanisms such as a dedicated task force made up of parliamentarians representing the different geopolitical groups at the IPU.

It also calls on IPU Member Parliaments to facilitate humanitarian assistance to those fleeing this war; and for the full and equal participation of women in the peace dialogues between parliamentarians of both countries.

South Africa joined Bahrain, Belarus, China, Iran, the Syrian Arab Republic, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe in expressing their reservations about the resolution.

A total of 178 countries' parliaments are represented at the IPU. Russia boycotted this assembly after the IPU condemned its invasion of Ukraine in a strongly-worded statement.

The IPU assembly will conclude on Thursday, when it will adopt resolutions.The South African Parliament delegation to the IPU includes Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, NCOP deputy chairperson Sylvia Lucas, National Assembly House chairperson Cedric Frolick, ANC deputy chief whip Doris Dlakude, ANC MP Fikile Masiko, DA MP Annelie Lotriet, and EFF chief whip Floyd Shivambu.

Shivambu objected on the South African delegation's behalf because they were concerned that certain clauses of the resolution would jeopardise the IPU's role and obligation as an impartial mediator for a peaceful solution to the conflict. He said:

There are certain objectionable statements that are made in the resolution. It doesn't matter whether they are factually true or not.

"What is of matter is the fact that they are objectionable and will weaken the integrity of the IPU in mediating on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine," said Shivambu, who recently expressed his support for Russia in a debate in the National Assembly.

"To wholly say that the Russian Federation is using artillery and missiles to destroy civilians populations, it is using missiles to destroy medical units and personnel, will not be an adequate basis for a mediation."

He said the Russian Federation would express a view that the IPU had already passed judgment on its activities.

"We cannot be forced to be part of a master narrative that reinforces the views of certain countries, particularly in Western Europe and the United States of America." 

According to a statement from Parliament, Mapisa-Nqakula and other speakers, through the General Assembly Secretariat, expressed a formal objection to the characterisation of the decision reached on the resolution as consensus.

"We have stated from the onset that this resolution is divisive, condemnatory, accusatory and may further inflame tensions and escalate an already worsening situation. We have expressed objection to certain parts of this resolution, and therefore, this must be recorded; there was no consensus," said Mapisa-Nqakula.

"Parliament continues to be concerned about the conflict, which threatens global peace, security and economy, and has called for the immediate cessation of hostilities through dialogue, mediation and negotiations," reads Parliament's statement.


We want to hear your views on the news. Subscribe to News24 to be part of the conversation in the comments section of this article.
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Zama zama crackdown: What are your thoughts on West Village residents taking the law into their own hands?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Authorities should bring in the army already
11% - 2194 votes
Illegal miners can't be scapegoated for all crime
49% - 9876 votes
What else did we expect without no proper policing
37% - 7415 votes
Vigilante groups are also part of the problem
4% - 743 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
16.55
-1.0%
Rand - Pound
20.03
-0.9%
Rand - Euro
16.85
-1.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.53
-0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.12
-0.5%
Gold
1,773.61
-0.1%
Silver
19.94
-1.0%
Palladium
2,148.51
-0.5%
Platinum
929.86
-0.9%
Brent-ruolie
92.34
-3.0%
Top 40
64,323
-0.6%
All Share
71,129
-0.5%
Resource 10
63,381
-3.1%
Industrial 25
87,470
+0.5%
Financial 15
16,273
+0.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE