Private schools can't kick kids out if parents misbehave - ConCourt

accreditation
The Constitutional Court has ruled that private schools may no longer rely on their contracts with parents as the basis for kicking children out of school without a fair hearing.
The Constitutional Court has ruled that private schools may no longer rely on their contracts with parents as the basis for kicking children out of school without a fair hearing.
Ashraf Hendricks, GroundUp
  • A dad who caused 'ugly scenes' at school sporting events was no basis to kick his kids out of their private school, the Constitutional Court ruled.
  • The case had progressed through the legal system since 2016.
  • The apex court ruled Johannesburg's Pridwin Preparatory School should have allowed representations to be heard.


An aggressive dad who caused scenes at sporting events was no basis to kick his kids out of their private school without a fair hearing, the Constitutional Court has ruled.

The apex court has ruled that private - or independent - schools may no longer rely on contracts with parents as the basis for kicking children out of school without a fair hearing, GroundUp reported.

The court said schools have a constitutional obligation to ensure that the best interests of children are paramount, including their right to basic education.

The case of a Grade 4 and a Grade R learner at Johannesburg's Pridwin Preparatory School had progressed through the legal system since 2016. The children were forced to leave the school following repeated incidents of bad behaviour by their parents.

Both the High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) found against the parents, saying the cancellation of the contract, which allowed for termination "for any reason", was legal.

While the Constitutional Court issued four judgments on the matter, all effectively came to the same conclusion.

In the majority ruling, Judge Leona Theron said it could have been argued that the matter was "moot" because the children were now enrolled at another school. But, she said, the precedents set by the High Court and the SCA had broader implications for the rights of pupils at independent schools.

"This is the first time this court has had the opportunity to squarely address this. It is also a rare opportunity because of the difficulties and costs involved in litigating these matters."

Relationship soured

The relationship between the parents and the school soured because of three incidents when the father became aggressive and caused ugly scenes during sporting events.

"The parents, as explained in the high court ruling, showed a disturbing overbearing pattern of persistent and alarming harassment of staff and several incidents that veered dangerously close to outright physical violence.

"Their misdeeds are astonishing and fall to be condemned in the strongest possible terms," Judge Theron said.

At one stage, the father signed an agreement promising to behave, but he soon breached this and a letter terminating the contract was sent to him.

The school did not dispute that it was bound by the Constitution to ensure the best interests of the child were paramount, but said it could not exclude the rights of other children, staff, parents and the school itself.

The other courts had found that Pridwin was not providing "basic education" as defined by the Constitution, because the right to attend was governed by a contract which was likened to an ordinary lease or commercial contract.

"This is unsustainable," Judge Theron said. "The provision of education is distinctly different from an ordinary commercial transaction."

Judge Theron said independent schools were not just for the wealthy.

"In 2015, they catered for 566 000 learners, a 40% increase over the past decade. They are thriving because of the crisis in education. And as their power and significance continues to grow, so does the need for constitutional protection."

She said the headmaster had repeatedly denied he had any obligation to give the parents, or the children, the right to a hearing and suggested it would have made no difference anyway.

But, she said, the purpose of a fair process was not to determine the father's guilt or otherwise, but rather to focus on whether the cancellation was consistent with the rights and best interests of the children.

Children ultimately punished

"This decision had a profound effect on the children. The boys had to leave school; it was the only school they had known. They had formed strong bonds with their teachers and friends.

"The school ought to have allowed representations to be heard, for their voices to be heard, either in person or through a representative.

"There was no fair process and it was not in their best interest. It was a violation of the school's responsibility not to interfere with their right to a basic education in the absence of any justification."

The court ordered that each party pay its own costs "because the application is tainted by the long shadow of the conduct that led them (the parents) to this court".

The judgment has been welcomed by the Centre for Child Law and Equal Education, both amicus curiae (friends of the court) in the case.

Equal Education said the judgment had consequences not only for elite independent schools, but also low-fee schools attended by pupils from working-class families.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
The ANC's leadership race is heating up. Who do you think will be elected party president at Nasrec in December?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has got it in the bag
7% - 811 votes
I foresee a second term for Cyril Ramaphosa
83% - 9279 votes
Don’t discount a Zweli Mkhize win
10% - 1089 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.01
-1.3%
Rand - Pound
20.11
+0.1%
Rand - Euro
17.64
-0.4%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.55
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.12
-1.0%
Gold
1,713.07
-0.2%
Silver
20.66
+0.1%
Palladium
2,253.50
-0.2%
Platinum
925.00
+0.3%
Brent Crude
93.37
+1.7%
Top 40
59,416
+0.4%
All Share
65,833
+0.3%
Resource 10
63,279
-0.6%
Industrial 25
80,027
+1.0%
Financial 15
13,997
+0.3%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE