Removal of Afrikaans at Unisa unlawful and unconstitutional - SCA

Unisa
Unisa
Sharon Seretlo, Gallo Images
  • The Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the removal of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction at Unisa was unlawful and unconstitutional.
  • The appeal was brought by AfriForum following a High Court judgment in 2018, in favour of Unisa's English-only language policy.
  • AfriForum argued that including Afrikaans as a language of instruction would not lead to segregation, as Unisa doesn't offer classes.


The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has ruled that the removal of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction at the University of South Africa (Unisa) was unlawful and unconstitutional.

The appeal was brought by lobby group AfriForum following a ruling by the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on 26 April 2018, in favour of a language policy determining that English be the primary language of instruction at this institution.

Delivering judgment electronically on Tuesday evening, SCA president, Judge Mandisa Maya, ruled that the "university's decision to replace its dual-medium language policy with [an] English-only policy infringed [the] principle of legality and [was] unlawful".

The SCA held that the university "failed to establish that it was not reasonably practicable to continue offering tuition in Afrikaans" and upheld AfriForum's appeal with costs.

Language policy set aside

The SCA set aside the resolutions of the council and senate of Unisa to approve a new language policy on 28 April and 30 March 2016.

It also ruled that the new language policy adopted by Unisa, where Afrikaans was removed as a language of tuition, was unconstitutional and unlawful.

The court ordered Unisa to prominently publish on its website, and in three major Afrikaans newspapers in South Africa, as well as in an email to all its students, a notice containing a full list of the modules that were on offer in Afrikaans as at 28 April 2016, offering all prospective students for the next academic year admission in such modules as presented on first-year level.

The university should also offer all existing students, if they were enrolled in any one of those courses, or "would have enrolled for the subsequent year courses available in Afrikaans, but had perforce to follow the module in English", a choice to enrol on the basis that they may follow the module in Afrikaans until completion of their studies.

The SCA said all the modules will have to be presented in full in the following academic years until the language policy has been lawfully amended, "if at all".

Henk Maree, spokesperson for AfriForum, said in November 2019 that the appeal was essential as the circumstances of Unisa are unique, as there are no classes, which cannot result in segregation of students.

According to the judgment, AfriForum trenchantly criticised the process followed by Unisa in reviewing its language policy. Its core contention…was that the impugned decisions violated the rights, by its count, of approximately 30 000 existing and prospective Afrikaans students, which "included white, black and coloured students from Afrikaans-speaking communities, to receive tuition in their mother tongue".

More to follow.


Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Have you downloaded the Covid-19 tracing app?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes I have
13% - 565 votes
No, and I will not be downloading it
77% - 3283 votes
Not yet, but I plan to
10% - 427 votes
Vote
ZAR/USD
16.82
(+0.45)
ZAR/GBP
21.52
(+0.33)
ZAR/EUR
19.64
(+0.50)
ZAR/AUD
11.91
(+0.16)
ZAR/JPY
0.16
(+0.46)
Gold
1874.10
(+0.39)
Silver
23.20
(+0.11)
Platinum
859.00
(+1.47)
Brent Crude
42.26
(+0.47)
Palladium
2226.01
(+0.88)
All Share
53540.23
(-1.30)
Top 40
49451.59
(-1.35)
Financial 15
9499.90
(-0.92)
Industrial 25
72448.25
(-2.40)
Resource 10
53411.65
(-0.18)
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes morningstar logo