Submissions on Pepuda Bill are mainly duplicates – deputy justice minister

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
John Jeffrey, Justice and Constitutional Development deputy minister. (Photo: Tladi Moloi)
John Jeffrey, Justice and Constitutional Development deputy minister. (Photo: Tladi Moloi)
  • Submissions on the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act appear to be duplicate comments.
  • The justice and correctional services ministry says the bill seeks to prevent discrimination and to promote equality.
  • Several religious organisations have raised concerns around the Pepuda bill.

Most submissions on the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (Pepuda) appear to be duplicate comments, albeit submitted by different persons or groups.

This is according to the Ministry of Justice and Correctional Services, which has reiterated that the bill seeks to distinguish between the duty of the state and public bodies in eliminating discrimination, promoting equality and achieving equality.

READ | 'Death knell': Christian groups slam proposed changes to laws around religion, discrimination

Ministry spokesperson Crispin Phiri said the department was studying the submissions received.

He said:

The Draft Bill seeks to prevent discrimination and promote equality, which includes full and equal enjoyment of the rights and freedoms in the Constitution and equal rights and access to resources, opportunities, benefits and advantages, and substantive equality. It seeks to expand the definition of discrimination to bring it in-line with established equality jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court.

The bill makes provision for the prohibition of retaliation against people who object to a discriminatory act, omission, or instituted proceedings.

"It should be noted that Chapter 5 of Pepuda, which deals with the promotion of equality, was never put into operation due to concerns about, amongst others, the regulatory burden that will be placed on all sectors in respect of reporting requirements. The amendments now seek to address these concerns, noting that promotion of equality is essential to the affirmation of equality as a foundational value of our Constitution and as such must be operationalised through legislation," he said.

But not everyone is happy with the provisions in the bill.

The United Ulama Council of South Africa said the avalanche of public comments on the bill were ones of dismay.

The council’s secretary-general Yusuf Patel described the bill as an attempt to impose a straitjacket ideology on South Africans, promoting conflict rather than reducing it.

"The Deputy Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development [John Jeffrey] intimated that a clause may be included in the bill which will provide specific protection of religious rights. It remains to be seen what this will consist of and the level of protection it will give to those who give public expression to their teachings of their faith," Patel said.

ALSO READ | Motsoaledi on polyandry: 'It's not the official govt position, it is to stimulate discussion'

According to Phiri, Jeffery had given the assurance that the government would continue to uphold all the rights in the Constitution.

"He further emphasised that the intention of the bill is not to interfere with the exercise of the rights in section 15 or any other right enshrined in the Constitution, nor is it intended to regulate religious institutions," Phiri said.

The department is set to evaluate all comments that have been received to revise the bill where necessary.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes, I believed it was authentic
8% - 36 votes
Yes, I didn't want to spend that much money on the original item
21% - 99 votes
No, I always shop at reputable stores
14% - 68 votes
No, I don't wear designer clothing
57% - 273 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
14.62
+1.3%
Rand - Pound
19.97
+1.0%
Rand - Euro
17.14
+1.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.64
+0.8%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+1.4%
Gold
1,770.90
+0.2%
Silver
22.79
+0.5%
Palladium
2,025.00
-0.2%
Platinum
1,007.00
+0.5%
Brent Crude
76.19
+2.5%
Top 40
57,433
+0.9%
All Share
63,819
+0.7%
Resource 10
57,361
+0.7%
Industrial 25
82,468
+1.2%
Financial 15
14,167
-0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE