The air we breathe is killing us: 'Deadly Air' case finally goes to High Court

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Civic organisations in coalition with Life After Coal stood in solidarity with applicants outside the Pretoria High Court on Monday.
Civic organisations in coalition with Life After Coal stood in solidarity with applicants outside the Pretoria High Court on Monday.
Julia Evans, GroundUp
  • The so-called Deadly Air case has headed to the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.
  • The case deals with air pollution in the Mpumalanga Highveld.
  • More than 100 people have picketed outside the court.

More than 100 people picketed outside the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on Monday, where the "Deadly Air" case had its first day in court.

The case deals with air pollution in the Mpumalanga Highveld. It was brought by two environmental activist organisations – groundWork and Vukani Environmental Justice Movement in Action (VEJMA). They are represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights, GroundUp reported.

The organisations asked the court to order Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Barbara Creecy to address the pollution.

READ | Fossil fuel pollution kills millions more than scientists initially assumed

Mpumalanga, home to 12 of Eskom's coal-fired power stations, was ranked among the world's worst hotspots for nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide emissions by Greenpeace in 2019.

Thabo Sibeko, a coordinator from EarthLife Africa who was outside the court, addressed the crowd, saying that many people die on the Highveld because of pollution from coal power stations.

Sibeko told GroundUp that many children don't go to school during winter because of pollution-related illnesses.

Palesa Ntaopane, from Sasolburg, said that the Natref refinery was a big problem for them.

"When you are at home, when you are in your room you can see the flares, and there's this funny smell sometimes, and it affects us. Most people really get sick because of it."

Ntaopane blamed her sinus problems on the pollution.

Nandie Khanye, from Ogies in Mpumalanga, said four mines and two power stations surrounded her community.

"Every morning when we wake up there is just black dust in our yards. Everywhere. There's no more fresh air," said Khanye.

VEJMA coordinator Promise Mabilo, from Emalahleni, said: "[The lawyers] are assisting the communities. What they want is the enforcement of the law to make sure that people on the highveld live in a healthy environment."

The court case

Advocate Steven Budlender argued before the court that the harmful air quality in the Highveld was a constitutional violation for those living and working in the area.

Budlender said that according to the environment department's own reports, 10 000 people die per year as a result of the poor air quality in Mpumalanga.

"This is a case where the department's own study says there is a problem … and says that the problem is that there is ineffective implementation," said Budlender.

He said the burden of the health impact fell most heavily on poor people who had no other place to live, relied on jobs in the area, and did not have access to proper health care.

The department gazetted the Highveld Priority Area Air Quality Management Plan in 2012, which set out a plan to reduce air pollution in Mpumalanga to a level that complies with national standards.

However, nine years later, none of the goals set out in this plan have been achieved, according to Budlender.

Budlender said the court should make an order that would force the minister to implement regulations to enforce the Highveld plan.

The case continues on Tuesday with the State's argument.

Do you want to know more about this topic? Sign up for one of News24's 33 newsletters to receive the information you want in your inbox. Special newsletters are available to subscribers.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When and why would you have your or your partner's sperm count checked?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
That's an unnecessary procedure
17% - 514 votes
As soon as we decide to start a family
7% - 201 votes
Only if we're struggling to conceive
76% - 2244 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
13.78
-0.3%
Rand - Pound
19.44
-0.2%
Rand - Euro
16.70
-0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.63
-0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.2%
Gold
1,865.95
-0.6%
Silver
27.84
-0.3%
Palladium
2,755.00
-0.9%
Platinum
1,168.39
+1.5%
Brent Crude
72.69
+0.2%
Top 40
61,654
+0.3%
All Share
67,942
+0.3%
Resource 10
65,584
-0.3%
Industrial 25
88,227
+0.7%
Financial 15
13,721
+0.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo