'You can't blindside us this way': Sea Point social housing property dispute gets technnical

accreditation
Supporters of Ndifuna Ukwazi and Reclaim the City in a break during court proceedings over the Tafelberg site in Sea Point. (Jenni Evans, News24)
Supporters of Ndifuna Ukwazi and Reclaim the City in a break during court proceedings over the Tafelberg site in Sea Point. (Jenni Evans, News24)

There is no requirement to seek public comment on a project before the government puts out a tender, the Western Cape High Court heard during the Sea Point social housing property dispute on Thursday. 

This point was made regarding whether the Western Cape provincial government sought comment properly before it decided to sell a 1.7ha site in the sought-after Cape Town suburb to a Jewish day school, instead of earmarking it for social housing. 

The Phyllis Jowell Jewish Day School (PJJDS) offered R135m to buy the derelict site with its empty school building and small staff accommodation building, from the Western Cape provincial government.

This after it decided to put the site up for tender and invite bids to buy it.

The school's bid was higher than market value, and the site was so sought-after that there was even another bid that was above market value, but not as high as the one the school had submitted.

The school wants to move from its current site in Camps Bay which has become unsuitable. It wants to restore the derelict school building on the heritage site for Jewish education. 

The PJJDS also plans to restore the old Tafelberg school building and flatten the old Wynyard Mansions which has 12 units. 

In its place, it will build 44 affordable housing units, which will be made available to staff members.

The staff do not have to be Jewish to live there.

The PJJDS plans to add a retirement home and relocate residents who are living in a building that is falling into disrepair, as well as a restaurant and day hospital. 

The Western Cape government agreed to sell the site in 2015 and the sale went through in 2017.

It, in turn, plans to use the R135m it will get from the sale to erect a building for the education department, instead of leasing offices - saving R40m per year by doing this. 

The court heard since the constitutionality of the sale process was being challenged, the plan for the building had fallen through. 

The Western Cape government has lost the commercial partners who were going to be part of the "precinct" that its education building was going to be built around.

Housing activists Reclaim the City and Ndifuna Ukwazi are questioning why it did not consider social housing for the site to redress spatial apartheid planning in the first place, and believe that failing to do this may be a violation of the Constitution.

It is also questioning some of the processes followed in deciding to sell the property to the day school. 

The court heard that not one social housing project had been built in Cape Town's CBD in 25 years, with the focus being outside the city centre. 

This means people who work in the city are still commuting long distances at great expense, and schoolchildren seeking a better education are taking exhaustive and potentially dangerous trips every day to schools in Sea Point and the inner city. 

Advocate Paul Farlam SC for the PJJDS said as far as the buyers were concerned, everything was in order for the sale. 

"You can't blindside us in this way," he added, as he picked apart the claim that the province should have sought public comment before putting the site out for tender. 

Farlam said the Western Cape government had the option to resile (abandon the agreement to sell) after this but decided not to exercise this option at a Cabinet meeting to make a final decision.

The court also heard submissions on whether the minister of human settlements was properly informed, and whether it was a legal obligation to inform her, in line with legal requirements for government departments to work together. 

The case continues on Friday.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
The EFF has voted with the DA to ensure they now govern Johannesburg, Tshwane and Ekurhuleni. Was this:
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
A brilliant strategic move by the DA not to make formal coalition agreements
24% - 2032 votes
A brilliant strategic move by the EFF to force the DA to negotiate with them
16% - 1362 votes
A recipe for disaster and five more years of unstable local government
60% - 5087 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
16.13
+0.9%
Rand - Pound
21.51
+0.2%
Rand - Euro
18.20
+0.4%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.51
+0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.14
-0.3%
Gold
1,795.32
+0.1%
Silver
23.40
+1.1%
Palladium
1,792.86
+2.4%
Platinum
955.69
+0.0%
Brent Crude
72.72
-11.6%
Top 40
62,411
0.0%
All Share
68,615
0.0%
Resource 10
64,074
0.0%
Industrial 25
92,909
0.0%
Financial 15
12,995
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE