Tribunal confirms R1.46bn settlement with construction companies

The Competition Tribunal has confirmed settlement agreements reached with construction companies fined for collusive tendering.

"The firms have agreed to penalties collectively totalling R1.46 billion. In terms of the Competition Act, the tribunal must confirm a settlement agreement concluded between the commission and a respondent in order for the settlement to be legally enforceable," the tribunal said in a statement today.

The Competition Commission investigates and refers restrictive business practices, abuse of dominance cases and large mergers to the tribunal for adjudication.

Last month, the commission announced that 15 construction companies agreed to pay fines that collectively totalled R1.46bn for collusive tendering. The settlements were reached in terms of the "construction fast-track settlement process" started in February 2011.

This process encouraged firms to make full disclosure of bid rigging, in return for penalties lower than what the commission would have sought if the cases were prosecuted.

Twenty-one firms responded to the offer, and 300 instances of bid rigging were revealed. The settlements related to projects concluded after 2006. Projects before that were beyond the act's prosecutorial reach.

The Competition Act stipulates that the money received from penalties must go to National Treasury.

The firms fined a total of R1 463 814 392 were:

» Aveng: R306 576 143;

» Basil Read: R94 936 248;

» Esorfranki: R155 850;

» G Liviero: R2 011 078;

» Giuricich: R3 552 568;

» Haw & Inglis: R45 314 041;

» Hochtief: R1 315 719;

» Murray & Roberts: R309 046 455;

» Norvo: R714 897;

» Raubex: R58 826 626;

» Rumdel: R17 127 465;

» Stefanutti: R306 892 664;

» Tubular: R2 634 667;

» Vlaming: R3 421 662;

» WBHO: R311 288 311.

The commission said they colluded to create the illusion of competition by submitting "sham tenders" or "cover pricing", to allow an alleged conspirator to win a tender.

"In other instances, firms agreed that whoever won a tender would pay the losing bidders a 'losing fee' to cover the costs of bidding. Sub-contracting was also used to compensate losing bidders," the commission said.

The three firms which did not accept the settlement offer were: Group 5, Construction ID, and Power Construction. Construction firms that did not disclose or settle contraventions would be investigated and prosecuted.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Zama zama crackdown: What are your thoughts on West Village residents taking the law into their own hands?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Authorities should bring in the army already
18% - 202 votes
Illegal miners can't be scapegoated for all crime
8% - 94 votes
What else did we expect without no proper policing
67% - 760 votes
Vigilante groups are also part of the problem
7% - 78 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
16.61
+1.0%
Rand - Pound
20.07
+0.9%
Rand - Euro
16.94
+0.8%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.60
-0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+1.0%
Gold
1,788.72
+0.8%
Silver
20.65
+3.8%
Palladium
2,244.50
+5.4%
Platinum
944.50
+0.8%
Brent Crude
94.92
+0.8%
Top 40
63,771
+1.0%
All Share
70,266
+1.1%
Resource 10
65,045
+1.5%
Industrial 25
85,829
+1.1%
Financial 15
15,741
+0.4%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE