WATCH | EXPLAINED: Why Oscar Pistorius is up for parole sooner than expected

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
  • Oscar Pistorius' sentencing was backdated by the Supreme Court of Appeal in August this year.
  • This means that instead of being eligible for parole in March 2023, he is now within his rights to apply for parole.
  • Part of this process requires him to engage with Reeva Steenkamp's parents in a victim-offender-dialogue.

Former Paralympic athlete, Oscar Pistorius, is officially eligible for parole after serving half his sentence for murder. He shot his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, through a bathroom door in 2013.

Pistorius was only expected to apply for parole in March 2023, but in August this year the Supreme Court of Appeal backdated his sentence to when he was first found guilty of culpable homicide by Judge Thokozile Masipa on 21 October 2014.

Pistorius' sentence was subsequently overturned and the former athlete was found guilty of murder. Masipa sentenced him to six years imprisonment after the Supreme Court of Appeal challenged her original sentencing for culpable homicide.

He had already served his sentence for culpable homicide and was out on parole.

READ | Reeva Steenkamp's parents willing to meet with Oscar Pistorius as he becomes eligible for parole

"It [the State] challenged her decision and subsequently convinced the Supreme Court of Appeal that even if Pistorius had believed Reeva Steenkamp to be an intruder, he was still guilty of murder under the principle of dolus eventualis, in that he must have reasonably foreseen that whoever was behind the toilet door would die," said News24's specialist legal journalist Karyn Maughan.

The State then challenged the six year sentence, stating it was "shockingly inappropriate". It convinced the Supreme Court of Appeal that Pistorius shouldn't serve less than the full minimum sentence for unpremeditated murder.

"Because he had served over 10 months in prison and, subsequently in correctional supervision, they deducted that period from the 15-year term and he was sentenced to 13 years and five months," explained Maughan.

Oscar and Reeva in 2012 a year before she was kill
Reeva Steenkamp and Oscar Pistorius together at the South African Sports Awards in 2012 at the Standton Convention Centre in Johannesburg.

This sentencing was, however, determined from the date of his murder conviction in 2016 - which is why, in August this year, the Supreme Court of Appeal backdated it to his original sentencing for culpable homicide in 2014.

"Otherwise, you would have had an entire period, that duration of about 506 days, which effectively counted as a non-parole period. And when you're looking at getting parole after half your sentence is completed, those kind of variables are very important," said Maughan.

Part of Pistorius' parole application will require him to meet with Reeva's parents in a "victim-offender-dialogue".

In an exclusive live interview on Good Morning Britain on Monday, the Steenkamps spoke about their feelings around Pistorius being awarded parole and meeting with him in person. 

Reeva's father, Barry Steenkamp, said he'd like to meet with Pistorius "man-to-man" to find out the truth about what actually happened on that fateful night.

June Steenkamp, Reeva's mother, said although she has forgiven Pistorius she doesn't feel he has shown remorse and should still have to "pay" for what he did by spending his full sentence behind bars.

A date has not yet been set for this engagement, but the correctional services department told News24 the Steenkamps will be properly prepared for the face-to-face visit with Pistorius, with "social workers, psychologists and a spiritual caregiver".

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
President Ramaphosa has punted the idea of mandatory Covid-19 vaccinations for South Africans. This is:
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
The right thing to do. We desperately need more South Africans vaccinated to prevent further mutations and restore normality in our lives.
71% - 9803 votes
A risky strategy. Compulsory vaccinations may have unintended consequences and damage our rollout campaign.
29% - 3947 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
16.05
+0.2%
Rand - Pound
21.23
+0.1%
Rand - Euro
18.12
+0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.27
-0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.14
+0.3%
Gold
1,781.93
-0.1%
Silver
22.48
-0.3%
Palladium
1,810.50
-0.3%
Platinum
939.40
+0.3%
Brent Crude
69.88
+0.3%
Top 40
64,307
0.0%
All Share
70,808
0.0%
Resource 10
66,503
0.0%
Industrial 25
93,791
0.0%
Financial 15
13,982
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE