Pro-Trump lawyers face $200 000 legal bill for 'frivolous' US election case

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
  • Pro-Trump lawyers face a legal bill of $200 000 in Michigan.
  • Sidney Powell and others sued the state to overturn its election results.
  • Judge Linda Parker ordered repayment and described the lawsuit as "frivolous".


Michigan officials on Wednesday demanded that lawyers who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former president Donald Trump's election defeat in the state pay about $200 000 to reimburse for legal fees and related costs.

US District Judge Linda Parker ruled in August that state and local election officials in Michigan were entitled to reimbursement of their legal fees, but has not yet determined the exact amount. 

READ | US voting machine maker launches massive $2.7 billion lawsuit against Fox News, Trump's lawyer

The judge will now review the $200 000 request to determine if it is reasonable.

Most of the $200 000 was requested by the City of Detroit, which spent about $180 000 on a private law firm in the case. The office of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel asked for about $20 000.

Parker ordered the repayment as part of sanctions against the lawyers who included Sidney Powell, a former campaign lawyer for Trump, and prominent litigator Lin Wood.

The Trump lawyers sued in Michigan in 2020 to overturn Democratic President Joe Biden's election victory over Trump. Parker suggested they might deserve to lose their law licences.

Parker said in her 25 August ruling that the pro-Trump lawyers should have investigated the Republican former president's voter fraud claims more carefully before filing what Parker called a "frivolous" lawsuit.

Parker, who dismissed the Michigan suit in December, formally requested that disciplinary bodies investigate whether the pro-Trump lawyers should have their law licenses revoked. 

The judge also ordered the lawyers to attend classes on the ethical and legal requirements for filing legal claims.

"This lawsuit represents a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process," Parker said in her decision, adding that the case "was never about fraud - it was about undermining the People's faith in our democracy and debasing the judicial process to do so".

Never miss a story. Choose from our range of newsletters to get the news you want delivered straight to your inbox.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 660 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
72% - 3587 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
15% - 758 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.20
-0.1%
Rand - Pound
21.30
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
18.70
-0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.22
-0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Platinum
1,012.08
0.0%
Palladium
1,618.86
0.0%
Gold
1,928.39
0.0%
Silver
23.60
0.0%
Brent Crude
86.66
-0.9%
Top 40
74,766
+0.4%
All Share
80,791
+0.4%
Resource 10
77,871
-0.4%
Industrial 25
103,872
+0.7%
Financial 15
16,281
+0.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE