WHO mission to China fails to find animal source of coronavirus

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
  • Experts believe the disease originated in bats and could have been transmitted to humans via another mammal.
  • The experts spent one month in China, two weeks in quarantine and the same again on fieldwork.
  • While transmission from animals was the likely route, so far "the reservoir hosts remain to be identified", according to one of the experts.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) mission to China to uncover the origins of the coronavirus has failed to identify the animal source, scientists said on Tuesday.

Experts believe the disease - which has gone on to kill more than 2.3 million people worldwide - originated in bats and could have been transmitted to humans via another mammal.

While transmission from animals was the likely route, so far "the reservoir hosts remain to be identified", Liang Wannian, head of the China team, told reporters.

He added that studies showed the virus "can be carried long-distance on cold chain products," appearing to nudge towards the possible importation of the virus - a theory that has abounded in China in recent months.

He also said there was "no indication" the sickness was in circulation in Wuhan before December 2019 when the first official cases have been recorded.

WHO foreign expert Ben Embarak, who was based in the WHO's Beijing office for two years from 2009, backed up the assertion saying there was no evidence of "large outbreaks in Wuhan" before then.

The mission is a diplomatically knotty one, which was trailed before it began by fears of a whitewash, with the US demanding a "robust" probe and China firing back with a warning not to "politicise" the investigation.

During the closely-monitored visit, reporters were largely kept at arms' length from the experts, but snippets of their findings crept out over Twitter and interviews.

The experts spent one month in China, two weeks in quarantine and the same again on fieldwork.

READ | WHO warns against dismissing AstraZeneca vaccine after setbacks

But, already over a year after the virus emerged, some of it was of questionable relevance to their stated aim of finding the virus source, including a visit to a propaganda exhibition celebrating China's recovery from the pandemic.

The group spent just an hour at the seafood market where many of the first reported clusters of infections emerged over a year ago.

They also appeared to spend several days inside their hotel, receiving visits from various Chinese officials without going out into the city.

READ HERE | UK mulls tougher testing for international arrivals as virus variants spread

But deeper research was carried out at the Wuhan virology institute where they spent nearly four hours and said they met with Chinese scientists there including Shi Zhengli, one of China's leading experts on bat coronaviruses and deputy director of the Wuhan lab.

Former US president Donald Trump repeated a controversial theory that a lab leak may have been the source of the pandemic.

Scientists at the laboratory conduct research on some of the world's most dangerous diseases, including strains of bat coronaviruses similar to Covid-19.

ALSO READ | Biden said Trump's handling of Covid-19 was 'even more dire than we thought'

Beijing is desperate to defang criticism of its handling of the chaotic early stages of the outbreak.

It has refocused attention at home - and abroad - on its handling of, and recovery from the outbreak.


Did you know you can comment on this article? Subscribe to News24 and add your voice to the conversation.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
Lockdown For
DAYS
HRS
MINS
Voting Booth
When and why would you have your or your partner's sperm count checked?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
That's an unnecessary procedure
17% - 666 votes
As soon as we decide to start a family
7% - 287 votes
Only if we're struggling to conceive
76% - 3065 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
13.77
+0.1%
Rand - Pound
19.39
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
16.69
+0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
10.58
+0.4%
Rand - Yen
0.13
+0.1%
Gold
1,858.90
-0.4%
Silver
27.65
-0.7%
Palladium
2,760.36
+0.1%
Platinum
1,155.87
-1.0%
Brent Crude
72.86
+0.2%
Top 40
61,062
-1.0%
All Share
67,311
-0.9%
Resource 10
64,119
-2.2%
Industrial 25
88,248
+0.0%
Financial 15
13,596
-0.9%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo