No sperm to spare

accreditation
A radical overhaul of sperm donation services in Britain is needed to cope with a critical shortage, fertility experts have said.

The British Fertility Society (BFS) said the removal of anonymity for donors in 2005 might have led to the lack of volunteers, leaving Britain struggling to meet the demand for donated sperm.

Some 400 patients need donor sperm every year and many clinics have long waiting lists or have been forced to stop providing services at all.

Writing in the British Medical Journal, Mark Hamilton and Allan Pacey from the BFS suggested that more families could be created from a single donor.

The current limit of 10 pregnancies per donor is designed to prevent siblings born from donation inadvertently having children together.

The authors said that means a minimum of 500 donors are needed every year, but in 2006 there were just 307.

The BFS argued that the size of the British population created a large safety margin as in the Netherlands, where there is a smaller population, the upper limit is 25.

The authors also suggested a shake-up in the recruitment services to increase the number of donors.

They said large regional centers should be created for donor management with smaller centers providing services for recipients.

Currently 35% of potential donors are lost after their first inquiry and never assessed, Hamilton and Pacey said.

However they ruled out raising the age of donors from the current maximum of 40 or lowering the acceptable levels of semen quality.

What are your thoughts on sperm donation?
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
Eskom has considered continuous load shedding at Stage 2, instead of introducing it when the power system faces a crunch. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
I'm all for it - we're going to have power cuts regardless, so we might as well have some stability to better plan our lives
45% - 4263 votes
No thanks! I prefer having periods of no load shedding and we cannot normalise this crisis
55% - 5136 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
17.96
-2.0%
Rand - Pound
19.39
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
17.36
+0.0%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.70
+0.0%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.1%
Gold
1,643.40
-0.0%
Silver
18.87
0.0%
Palladium
2,073.00
0.0%
Platinum
858.50
0.0%
Brent Crude
86.15
-5.0%
Top 40
57,110
-3.1%
All Share
63,417
-2.9%
Resource 10
56,319
-7.5%
Industrial 25
78,436
-1.2%
Financial 15
14,142
-1.6%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE