Why sexting must be on the school curriculum

Research from around the world shows that at least one in eight teens has had a sexually explicit image of themselves forwarded, without consent. Teens need to be educated on the dangers of sexting.
Research from around the world shows that at least one in eight teens has had a sexually explicit image of themselves forwarded, without consent. Teens need to be educated on the dangers of sexting.

Sex education remains a fiercely debated topic, both in the media and among politicians.

A recent controversial segment on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle discussed whether schools should teach students about “sexting” (sharing sexually explicit images or videos through electronic means). In Canada’s largest province, the leader of Ontario’s Progressive Conservative party recently vowed to repeal the sex-education curriculum if elected premier in next month’s election.

We cannot politicise the reality of sexual behaviours in youth. The reality is that almost half of youth in the United States have sex prior to leaving high school.

Teen sexting is also common. A study of more than 110,000 teens suggests that one in every seven are sending sexts, and one in four are receiving sexts. This number is on the rise. For example, the average rate of teens sending sexts went from 5% in 2009 to 20% in 2014 — a fourfold increase.

And, even more alarmingly, the prevalence of non-consensual sexting is 12%. This means that at least one in eight teens are having a sexually explicit image of themselves forwarded, without consent. In many countries, this represents a criminal offence.

Many parents are concerned about digital safety but only 40% are talking regularly to their children about what is appropriate content to view and share online. That leaves 6 out of every 10 youth potentially vulnerable to victimization. And this is why we need to talk about it in schools.

The central benefit of educating about digital health, safety and security in schools is that it provides teens with a “two-gated” approach. If conversations about digital health and safety are not happening at the first gate, in the youth’s home, then youth can receive this information at the second gate, at school.

The two-gated approach guarantees that 10 out of 10 youth will receive the information they need to avoid digital dilemmas and risks.

Talk about consensual sex

While the digital age has introduced many benefits, one of its perils is the risk of teens being bullied or harassed through electronic mediums, a phenomenon known as cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying is a real challenge for today’s teens that often results in psychological consequences varying from stress to suicidal ideation.

The suicide of Canadian teenager Amanda Todd is one example. At the age of 13, Amanda Todd was convinced to expose herself to a man she had met online, who took a picture of her and proceeded to blackmail her with the image. A sexually explicit photo of her was posted and widely circulated online. In a video posted to YouTube prior to her death, Amanda attributed her anxiety and depression to her online victimization and humiliation.

While rare, these cases highlight the need to discuss digital health and safety with youth. This topic is all the more pressing considering the near universal access that children and teens have to smartphones, computers and the internet.

Throughout the world, a concept known as digital citizenship has been introduced into many school curricula. This concept refers to the practice of being safe, legal and ethical in one’s online behaviours.

Educating youth to be good digital citizens and to understand cyberbullying and digital dilemmas involves talking about consensual and non-consensual sex and sexting.

Be proactive: do it early

Of course, we can’t put all the responsibility on schools and educators. Discussions about digital safety and health should be happening at home as well.

Parents should talk to their children early and often about this topic, as well as about sex, sexuality, peer pressure and healthy relationships.

The digital world is changing rapidly, and so too is teenage development, so parents need to revise and revisit these discussions as often as possible.

But, as mentioned, only 40% of parents are actually having these conversations on a regular basis.

Clearly, we need to do a better job of disseminating the many existing resources that encourage and provide parents with tips on talking with their children about online safety and citizenship. Perhaps this could be a priority of Melania Trump’s new #BeBest campaign.

But a benefit of receiving information from multiple sources, including school, is that it provides more information and more opportunities for discussion.

Some children may find that they are more comfortable talking about digital health and safety in a group context, such as in school.

The key is to talk about digital safety early. Children and youth can then be equipped with solutions on how to deal with unwanted situations when they arise.

It’s a proactive approach rather than a reactive one. And it can safeguard our children.

If trusted adults include both parents and educators, it means our youth have more opportunities to get the help they need to rectify, remedy or make a supportive plan for dealing with a challenging situation.

Call it digital health

The decision to keep or discard a sex-education curriculum should not be debated. We are beyond that.

Instead, our focus should be on our children’s best interests. And how we as parents and educators can create the best circumstances for our youth to thrive.

As they develop, sexuality will continue to be a pressing topic on the minds of teens. Despite many of our best efforts or wishes, it’s not something that we can program out of them. Nor can we create a school curriculum that excludes sexuality from their collective thinking.

In fact, as research has shown the ineffectiveness of abstinence-only education programs on rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, there has been a push towards more comprehensive sex education. With the growing role of technology in the most intimate aspects of our lives, it is negligent not to effectively prepare our kids for this reality.

Our argument is that educating kids about sexuality mediated through the internet is essential to keeping them safe.

Sexual education in school is a logical and effective way to encourage these discussions. Call it by a different name — digital health or digital citizenship — but it should be included, as the potential risks are too great to ignore.

Let’s not let the political narrative blur the lines of who and what we are most concerned about — the safety and well-being of our children and adolescents.

The ConversationIf educators are interested in resources for discussing digital citizenship, Common Sense Media has a digital citizenship program for K-12. Parents can also consult Digital Citizenship: Guide for Parents for further information.

Sheri Madigan, Assistant Professor, Canada Research Chair in Determinants of Child Development, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary; Camille Mori, M.Sc. student, clinical psychology program, University of Calgary, and Jeff Temple, Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Director, Behavioral Health and Research, The University of Texas Medical Branch

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Do you think sex education should be scrapped? Or should schools actually be going into more in depth discussions and encouraging sex positivity? Share your thoughts by emailing chatback@parent24.com and we may publish it on the site. 

Read more:

Sign up to our weekly newsletter to receive Parent24 stories directly to your inbox.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
Voting Booth
What are your thoughts on the possibility of having permanent Stage 2 or 3 load shedding?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
I'll take that over constant schedule changes
13% - 371 votes
Why are we normalising Eskom’s mess?
73% - 2105 votes
I've already found alternative ways of powering my home/business
14% - 411 votes
Rand - Dollar
Rand - Pound
Rand - Euro
Rand - Aus dollar
Rand - Yen
Brent Crude
Top 40
All Share
Resource 10
Industrial 25
Financial 15
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.