Leon Jenkins was 43 when he took his own life in July 2018. He livestreamed his suicide on an internet forum where users can freely – and viciously – insult, berate, provoke and abuse each other. The idea is to make people leave the site when they can take no more.
Gregory Tomkins and Kevin Whitrick also broadcast their suicides live on the internet. All three were active members of online insult communities. There are thousands of people who log on to such platforms for the sole reason of abusing others in an attempt to force them to leave the thread – a distressing online power struggle of domination and submission.
- Also read Boytjie hero Logan Paul’s sickening video reinforces call for better child protection online
Reviewing this case, it seems that at least two of these men had something in common: Leon Jenkins reportedly told his abusive community that he suffered from depression; Kevin Whitrick was said to have had a history of depression. The coroner in an inquest into his death called for a ban on these sites to prevent further suicides.
This is primarily because there is no screening process for vulnerability on these forums that you might find, for example, in prisons. In fact, there is nothing to cover the issue beyond a direct question at the registration stage, and this is easily manipulated and really serves only to protect the site, not the user.
Even if a would-be user did highlight their vulnerability and were excluded, this could potentially do greater harm by preventing them from connecting with others, if it was the only form of contact they had with other people. The solution is neither straightforward nor obvious.
- Also read 13 reasons to talk about teen suicide
Do you think social media sites should be doing more to protect their users, especially minors? Should they screen users before they're allowed to join social media platforms, or ban abusive threads? Should they remove the users' anonymity? Or does that infringe on their privacy? Would do you think? Tell us by emailing email@example.com and we may publish your comments on the site. Do let us know if you'd like to remain anonymous.
Who are these online sadists?
It is not clear what motivates people to seek out such sites and endure abuse or mete it out to others. Are the abusers online trolls? Cyber-bullies with anger and aggression problems? Or can they be judged as online sadists? Regardless, without any specific terminology for these individuals one thing is certain: the abusers gain gratification from humiliating and tormenting others online. And there are zero repercussions for this damaging behaviour in the way that there would be in the real world.
Online abusers can cause hurt to others, and do so repetitively, without interruption and all the while are protected by the safety that anonymity provides in cyberspace.
Either way, the research behind online trolling or abusive behaviour is in its infancy, much like the existence of these sites. Research on criminal narratives, if a sample of abusers could be accessed, would build on this emerging area of study, and provide insight into the roles that these abusers see themselves playing.
- Also read Childhood bullying can cause lifelong psychological damage – here’s how to spot the signs and move on
Who are the victims?
However, finding ways to protect vulnerable people should be the first priority.
One such avenue would be to examine the notes and messages these victims leave behind online. In our work on online suicide notes, important behavioural aspects give an insight into the struggles that individuals are facing at the time. Further study could begin the process of finding mechanisms to help provide support to those exhibiting risk behaviours such as depression, despair or hopelessness online and build on the narrative research that has had some success in identifying victim roles.
Perhaps these victims were not fully aware of the extreme abusive nature of these platforms when registering. However, after repeated humiliation, degrading, abuse and harassment, individuals can become susceptible to psychological harm, such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), self-harm, and suicide.
The reasons victims return to these sites to face abuse again and again are unclear, but it could be that they feel being abused is the only way they have available to connect with other people. But more research is needed to establish whether or not repeated visits result in some kind of addiction in victims.
- Also read: Children and trauma: When bad things happen
Why do these sites not prevent abuse or intervene?
Some might wonder why these sites aren’t trying to prevent gratuitously abusive behaviour that can lead to suicide.
The reason is an economic one: there is no incentive or onus on them to do anything. There is no proper or effective policing, accountability or consequences. Such sites can generate huge revenues in reaching millions of members, through advertising income and subscription fees.
In our work highlighting these issues within the media, we have called on social media sites to do more to protect their users and requested a discussion around the issue of anonymity. Without accountability, it will always be harder to safeguard vulnerable people online.
John Synnott, Senior Lecturer in Investigative and Forensic Psychology, University of Huddersfield; Calli Tzani Pepelasi, Lecturer in Investigative Psychology, University of Huddersfield, and Maria Ioannou, Reader in Investigative & Forensic Psychology, University of Huddersfield
Do you think social media sites should be doing more to protect their users? Should they screen users before they're allowed to join social media platforms? Should they remove their anonymity? Or does that infringe on their privacy? Would do you think? Tell us by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org and we may publish your comments on the site. Do let us know if you'd like to remain anonymous.
- Court rules parents can inherit deceased daughter's Facebook account
- Do you really know what your kid's doing on that smartphone?
- Cyberbullying: 4 steps to protect your kids