Share

SA to ask International Court of Justice to declare Israel an apartheid state

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
This picture taken from the border with the Gaza Strip shows a column of smoke during an Israeli strike on the Palestinian territory on 21 November 2023, amid ongoing battles between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement.
This picture taken from the border with the Gaza Strip shows a column of smoke during an Israeli strike on the Palestinian territory on 21 November 2023, amid ongoing battles between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement.
John Macdougall/AFP
  • Naledi Pandor says South Africa intends to approach the International Court of Justice to have Israel declared an apartheid state.
  • South Africa, along with other countries, last week requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate Israel for war crimes.
  • The ICC's prosecutor confirmed an investigation has been ongoing since 2021.

Not only did South Africa lay a charge against Israel for war crimes at the International Criminal Court (ICC), but it will also petition the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to declare it an apartheid state.

This is according to International Relations and Cooperation Minister Naledi Pandor in response to a parliamentary question.

EFF MP Vuyani Pambo asked: "In light of how global solidarity and sanctions played a significant role in undermining the apartheid project in the Republic, what is the government doing practically to show solidarity with the people of Palestine, except the perceived lip service and empty messages?"

Pandor answered that South Africa and Palestine were currently working on formulating practical strategies towards taking up the Palestinian cause to the ICC and ICJ, both in The Hague, the Netherlands, to "declare Israel as an apartheid state".

ADVERTISEMENT

She added:

South Africa will directly petition the ICJ to give advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, from its prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967.

Pandor said on a continental level, South Africa was instrumental in lobbying for Israel not to be granted observer status to the African Union.

"In February 2023, South Africa welcomed the suspension of Israel's observer status at the African Union.

"South Africa objected against the unilateral granting of official observer status by the chairperson of the African Union Commission on 22 July 2021.

ADVERTISEMENT

"This action came at a time when the Israeli oppression became more brutal, the oppressed people of Palestine were and are subjected to bombardments and continued illegal settlements on their land, further hampering any efforts to the peace process."

International Court of Justice
The Vredespaleis (Peace Palace) in The Hague, the Netherlands, which houses the International Court of Justice.
News24 Jan Gerber

Pandor said on a global level, South Africa supported Palestinian efforts to obtain membership of the UN and "the creation of positive, credible, and lasting international mechanisms to address the Palestinian cause based on international law".

She added that Parliament voted on 7 March in favour of a motion to downgrade the South African embassy in Israel to a liaison office.

"Since the recall of South Africa's ambassador to Tel Aviv in 2018, the South African Embassy in Israel has been headed by a charge d'affaires," said Pandor.

sa
International Relations and Cooperation Minister Naledi Pandor.
News24 Alfonso Nqunjana

On 17 November, South Africa, along with the Comoros, Djibouti, Bolivia, and Bangladesh, jointly referred the situation in Palestine and Israel to the ICC.

ICC prosecutor Karim Khan said in a statement his office had received the referral and confirmed his office was investigating the situation in Palestine.

"This investigation, commenced on 3 March 2021, encompasses conduct that may amount to Rome Statute crimes committed since 13 June 2014 in Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

"It is ongoing and extends to the escalation of hostilities and violence since the attacks that took place on 7 October 2023.

"In accordance with the Rome Statute, my office has jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a state party and with respect to the nationals of state parties," added Khan.

READ | SA ambassador in the Hague delivers referral to ICC, calling for war crimes probe against Israel

He said his team investigating the situation "is moving with focus in collecting, preserving and analysing information and communications from key stakeholders in relation to relevant incidents" and they have collected a "significant volume of information and evidence".

ADVERTISEMENT
International Criminal Court
The International Criminal Court in The Hague, the Netherlands.
News24 Jan Gerber

International human rights watchdogs like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have long advocated that Israel is practising apartheid.

On 16 December 1966, the UN adopted a resolution declaring apartheid a crime against humanity.

The UN's General Assembly adopted the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid in 1973 with 91 votes in favour, four against - South Africa, the UK, US, and Portugal - and 26 abstentions.

The convention, which came into force in 1976, declares "that apartheid is a crime against humanity and that inhuman acts resulting from the policies and practices of apartheid and similar policies and practices of racial segregation and discrimination … are crimes violating the principles of international law".

The Crime of Apartheid

In terms of the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, the crime of apartheid applies "to the following inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them":

(a) Denial to a member or members of a racial group or groups of the right to life and liberty of person.

(i) By murder of members of a racial group or groups.

(ii) By the infliction upon the members of a racial group or groups of serious bodily or mental harm, by the infringement of their freedom or dignity, or by subjecting them to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

(iii) By arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment of the members of a racial group or groups.

(b) Deliberate imposition on a racial group or groups of living conditions calculated to cause its or their physical destruction in whole or in part.

(c) Any legislative measures and other measures calculated to prevent a racial group or groups from participation in the political, social, economic and cultural life of the country and the deliberate creation of conditions preventing the full development of such a group or groups, in particular by denying to members of a racial group or groups basic human rights and freedoms, including the right to work, the right to form recognised trade unions, the right to education, the right to leave and to return to their country, the right to a nationality, the right to freedom of movement and residence, the right to freedom of opinion and expression, and the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

d) Any measures including legislative measures, designed to divide the population along racial lines by the creation of separate reserves and ghettos for the members of a racial group or groups, the prohibition of mixed marriages among members of various racial groups, the expropriation of landed property belonging to a racial group or groups or to members thereof.

(e) Exploitation of the labour of the members of a racial group or groups, in particular by submitting them to forced labour.

(f) Persecution of organisations and persons, by depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms, because they oppose apartheid.

A report published by Amnesty International in 2022 found "that Israel has established and maintained an institutionalised regime of oppression and domination of the Palestinian population for the benefit of Jewish Israelis - a system of apartheid - wherever it has exercised control over Palestinians' lives since 1948".

"Amnesty International concludes that the State of Israel considers and treats Palestinians as an inferior non-Jewish racial group."

Amnesty International found the segregation is conducted in a systematic and highly institutionalised manner through laws, policies and practices, "all of which are intended to prevent Palestinians from claiming and enjoying equal rights to Jewish Israelis within the territory of Israel and within the OPT [occupied Palestinian territory], and thus are intended to oppress and dominate the Palestinian people".

READ | BRICS group, UN and world leaders accuse Israel of 'war crimes and genocide'

At least one South African political party will not be impressed by Pandor's intention to have Israel declared an apartheid state.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Tuesday, the National Assembly adopted a motion that the government should cut diplomatic ties with Israel, albeit that this motion is not binding on the government.

When the motion was debated last week, ACDP leader Kenneth Meshoe said to label Israel as an apartheid state was a lie that was coined by "haters" of the country.

"Furthermore, to insinuate that Israel does not own land they are living on is another lie that the ACDP rejects.

"It is only the enemies of Israel, the ignorant and the people who are allergic to truth, who stubbornly refuse to accept the fact that the land the Israelis are living on was given by God to Abraham and his descendants long before the existence of Christianity and Islam."

Discover the Truth
Step into a world where the truth shines bright, and every headline is worth your time. With News24, you're not just reading the news; you are part of a community that values knowledge and insight. Immerse yourself in compelling stories, sharp analyses, and content that keeps you ahead of the curve.
Subscribe to News24 now
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
What do you think about President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent use of commercial air travel?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It's a great saving on taxpayer money
18% - 384 votes
It's a poor look for the SA Air Force
16% - 334 votes
He should normalise it and do it more
52% - 1087 votes
His modes of travel are irrelevant to me
14% - 292 votes
ADVERTISEMENT
Rand - Dollar
17.12
+0.3%
Rand - Pound
22.48
+0.4%
Rand - Euro
19.85
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
11.19
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.11
+0.6%
Platinum
1,610.10
+1.5%
Palladium
1,472.25
+0.3%
Gold
4,181.00
+1.3%
Silver
52.85
+3.2%
Brent Crude
65.16
+1.7%
Top 40
105,473
+1.6%
ALSI
112,908
+1.6%
RESI 10
113,694
+2.2%
INDI 25
145,913
+0.9%
FINI 15
23,460
+2.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
ADVERTISEMENT
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

Learn More