Don't blame transformation for SA rugby woes

Mark Keohane (File)
Mark Keohane (File)

Transformation is not fashionable and it is not ‘so yesterday'. It is an ongoing crisis in South African Rugby. The lack of transparency needs to be constantly challenged.
Merit is not white and development is not black.

To the bigots who read this column, forget the simpleton argument that all you want is the best team, black or white. It doesn’t have substance because the so called best national team on average since 1992 averages two black players in the starting XV. The results, but for the occasional high, have been abysmal, but the 13 white players aren’t blamed for the shocking returns. What’s blamed is transformation, which is presented as fact when it is nothing more than an ingrained prejudice.
I am sick of hearing the defence of merit based on white and the condescending applause of a black player who shouldn’t be defined by anything but his brilliance on the rugby field.
I still hear people talk of Springbok rugby’s greatest try scorer Bryan Habana as being good for a quota player but the many white wingers whose Springbok wing careers are defined by the mediocre are accepted as merit selections.
It is disgusting but what is even more disgusting (for me) is that the saviour of SA Rugby, endorsed by smaller unions who should be as insignificant as the mediocre historical white Springbok winger, is the Leopards Rugby Union president Andre May, who will challenge incumbent Mark Alexander on April 6.
May’s only relevance to the SA Rugby landscape is that he is one of only two provincial union presidents who refused to sign the South African Rugby Union transformation charter.
He shouldn’t be in South African rugby, let alone a candidate to lead the sport in 2018.
The acceptance of white mediocrity in our rugby selections appals me; equally the resistance to acknowledging the quality of black rugby players.
May, in the calendar year, comes after April and before June. In terms of our rugby, a man who refuses to embrace transformation should come before or after nothing. He shouldn’t even be a consideration.
The emphasis on transformation has to come from the existing leadership of president Mark Alexander, his deputy Francois Davids and the CEO Jurie Roux. The trio simply have to show strength in their conviction about what is right for the game. They have to crack the whip or find a way constitutionally to lead South Africa out of the suffocation that is white endorsement.
It’s a fact that the game, 25 years after unification, remains white on the playing field, the trio have the privilege of being at the forefront of change. Now is their time to show it.
SA Rugby Magazine’s Jon Cardinelli’s factual and unemotional detailing of the failings of SA Rugby to transform professionally on the field in Super Rugby is damning of the franchises.
Equally, the statistics are unacceptable if rugby is to mirror the transformation of South Africa as a society.
I can’t endorse the candidacy of a man who can’t understand the obvious in why rugby has to transform. Equally, the incumbents can’t escape censure because of an imbalanced provincial/regional constitution that allows the tail to parade as the dog in South African Rugby.
Cardinelli detailed the absolute failure of the franchises to transform and then questioned the realism of expecting Springboks coach Rassie Erasmus’s 2019 World Cup Springboks to be a 50/50 black/white on-field selection.
Take a read of Cardinelli’s research and then you be the judge of whether transformation is at the heart of South African (and by extension Springboks) rugby failure, or if prejudice and white bias in selection is more a sin than a salvation?
Here’s what Cardinelli wrote: "Consider how the franchises have fared in this department between 2014 and 2017. As many as 107 black players featured in Super Rugby during that period. Only 17 of those players amassed 30 or more starts over those four seasons. As many as 73 of those 107 players started 15 or fewer games."
Translated in percentages, 15% of the Super Rugby established professional black playing base is expected to provide 50 percent of the 2019 Springbok Rugby World Cup run on XV.
That’s why so many believe that 35 percent of the black player selection is quota, because so few black players are given an equal opportunity to be part of that 50 percent selection; let alone the 100 percent.
Think about it, 85 percent of South Africa’s senior Super Rugby white player base (30 starts or more) have won nothing in Super Rugby in the last four years, yet the perception, reported as fact, is that South African rugby is at a low because of black player transformation.
The notion is as insulting as May’s presidential ambitions.

Mark Keohane is a Cape-Town based award-winning rugby specialist and former Springbok Communications Manager. Follow him on Twitter 

Disclaimer: Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.

Previous Mark Keohane columns on Sport24:

Stormers don't have halfbacks to challenge in Super Rugby

Bulls will be a different animal under Mitchell

Back Sharks to be SA's top team

Rassie's Boks will beat England's Eddie

Shocking results, not race behind Coetzee's axing

No tournament with Sunwolves can be 'best v best'!

How Rassie plans to re-align SA Rugby

Scrap the 30-Test ruling and make Cheslin Kolbe a Bok!

Blitzboks, not All Blacks, the talk of Cape Town

Kids don't win RWCs, get back Duane, Frans!

Why Rassie is the man to take Boks forward

Paris glory won't erase Albany and Dublin gore

I'd happily take a 1-point win!

To vote against SA's bid would be an insult

Bosch will win Currie Cup final for Sharks

No current Bok would make 2007 team!

Dublin is D-Day for Boks

All Blacks' lack of desire gives Boks a sniff

Boks will beat Wallabies, but...

Bok changes won't spell panic

Boks will run All Blacks close

Win or lose in Perth, Boks have made progress!

Etzebeth is the right choice for Bok captain!

Kriel sets example others should follow

Combrinck to lead Lions to Super Rugby title

Jantjies the man to lead Lions to glory

Stormers WILL reach Super Rugby semis!

Stormers need to back youngster Willemse

Serfontein, Mostert the Boks standouts

Boks must extend Brendan 'Mr Fixit' Venter's role

Coetzee's Lions-laden Bok side can't lose!

Expect a different looking Bok starting XV!

Fear not, Boks will whitewash France 3-0!

Hey Allister, load the Boks with Lions!

The RWC 2019 gods have smiled on the Boks!

Unleash Curwin Bosch on the French!

YES, an overseas-based SA team would beat the Boks, but...

The next Springbok skipper has to be...

Super Rugby cull good for SA rugby

Clap, clap ... Venter's appointment should be applauded

South African rugby NEEDS to host RWC 2023

Why SA can't have 6 Super Rugby teams

Super 12 glory is now Super 18 gory

No winner is SARU's half-cocked overseas policy

Keeping Coetzee sadly no April Fools' joke

Mediocrity must fall!

Overseas based SA players are no traitors!

Sick Boks need more than a new doctor

Joost earned more than a minute's silence

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
loading... Live
India 325/10 & 69/0
New Zealand 62/10
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 5542 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
7% - 936 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
20% - 2886 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
34% - 4724 votes