No tournament with Sunwolves can be 'best v best'!

Mark Keohane (File)
Mark Keohane (File)

SANZAAR chief executive Andy Marinos described the revamped Super 15 as ‘best versus best’ and an improvement on the now defunct Super 18.

But no tournament in which Japan’s Sunwolves are playing can be described as the ‘best versus best’. To do so is to take a liberty and to seriously take advantage of poetic licence.

Super 15 will be an improvement on the mess that paraded as Super Rugby, but the tournament still needs a reduction in team numbers before it again can take its place as the premier non-international global professional rugby competition.

For now, the Champions Cup, aligned with Top 14 and the Premiership, comfortably offers a greater attraction, in terms of quality, variety and strength versus strength.

The Champions Cup quarter-finalists were determined on Sunday and 15 teams were competing for the final five places on the last weekend of the Pool stages. It’s this competitiveness that defines the Champions Cup, and Super Rugby (in its current guise) will never compete with Champions Cup, for sheer drama and intensity. The absolute divorce in strength versus strength in Super Rugby means that the top four to six are often decided long before the final league round of matches.

The Sunwolves' initial introduction could have been explained as a SANZAAR initiative, aimed at expanding the competition’s commercial potential and tapping into the Japanese market. South Africa, understandably, would have supported this on the belief and understanding that Japan would endorse South Africa’s 2023 Rugby World Cup bid.

Why else would South Africa even entertain the Japanese option?

South Africa gets no benefit from having the  in Super Rugby. It only adds to the travel and the tournament length. South Africa sacrificed two regional teams (Cheetahs and Kings) in Super Rugby’s reduction but it was done on the premise that Japan would obviously back South Africa’s World Cup ambitions.

Japan completely betrayed South Africa by voting for France. Japan also used its influence in Asia to push France’s Rugby World Cup bid. There were several business deals done between corporates in Japan and France and it was apparent that Japan never had any alliance with South Africa.

Which again asks what the hell the Sunwolves are doing in a reduced Super Rugby when the Cheetahs, as just one example, were given the chop?

Australia and New Zealand are the beneficiaries of a Japanese association with Super Rugby. South Africa gets absolutely no value now that the Rugby World Cup vote has come and gone.

The Super 15 status quo will remain for this year and in 2019, the Rugby World Cup year. But I’d like to think South Africa’s rugby bosses share the view that from 2020 onwards there is no place for the Sunwolves in Super Rugby, whatever the competition structure.

Less is more in Super Rugby, and the original 12 team single round and top four play-off format remains the most appealing. It is also a reflection of best plays best.

In an ideal world, we’d see Super 12 in 2020. It may even be a romantic notion to think that sanity would trump saturation and that we’ll ever again see a Super 12. But what we shouldn’t be seeing post the 2019 Rugby World Cup is any more South African charity for Japan.

Charity begins at home and the interests of South African teams must come before the Sunwolves.

The talk is that Griquas and Pumas will play in the Anglo-Welsh Cup and potentially be included in an expanded PRO14. It will allow South Africa to produce four professional regions playing in the northern hemisphere to go with the four regions playing in Super Rugby.

Ideally, I’d want to see a stronger South African presence up north but that is unlikely to happen, unless Super Rugby becomes Super 12 and one of the traditional South African four regions opts to play in the north, which would include the possibility of playing in the financially very lucrative Champions Cup.

I don’t see Super 15 being much different to Super 18. It will be a two-division type race where the top six or eight will be determined midway through the tournament, and effectively the tournament gives South African and New Zealand supporters the strength versus strength domestic competition of yesteryear in the guise of Conference match-ups.

The Currie Cup, in its strongest format, gets replicated for the four regions (really the four main provinces) in Super Rugby, but the adjective super simply cannot be used in the same sentence as the Sunwolves.

The Champions Cup is the new Super Rugby, which is why I’d want our best teams playing up north instead of the farce that are matches in Singapore, which has no rugby soul and spectator presence.

Mark Keohane is a Cape-Town based award-winning rugby specialist and former Springbok Communications Manager. Follow him on Twitter

Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.

Previous Mark Keohane columns on Sport24:

How Rassie plans to re-align SA Rugby

Scrap the 30-Test ruling and make Cheslin Kolbe a Bok!

Blitzboks, not All Blacks, the talk of Cape Town

Kids don't win RWCs, get back Duane, Frans!

Why Rassie is the man to take Boks forward

Paris glory won't erase Albany and Dublin gore

I'd happily take a 1-point win!

To vote against SA's bid would be an insult

Bosch will win Currie Cup final for Sharks

No current Bok would make 2007 team!

Dublin is D-Day for Boks

All Blacks' lack of desire gives Boks a sniff

Boks will beat Wallabies, but...

Bok changes won't spell panic

Boks will run All Blacks close

Win or lose in Perth, Boks have made progress!

Etzebeth is the right choice for Bok captain!

Kriel sets example others should follow

Combrinck to lead Lions to Super Rugby title

Jantjies the man to lead Lions to glory

Stormers WILL reach Super Rugby semis!

Stormers need to back youngster Willemse

Serfontein, Mostert the Boks standouts

Boks must extend Brendan 'Mr Fixit' Venter's role

Coetzee's Lions-laden Bok side can't lose!

Expect a different looking Bok starting XV!

Fear not, Boks will whitewash France 3-0!

Hey Allister, load the Boks with Lions!

The RWC 2019 gods have smiled on the Boks!

Unleash Curwin Bosch on the French!

YES, an overseas-based SA team would beat the Boks, but...

The next Springbok skipper has to be...

Super Rugby cull good for SA rugby

Clap, clap ... Venter's appointment should be applauded

South African rugby NEEDS to host RWC 2023

Why SA can't have 6 Super Rugby teams

Super 12 glory is now Super 18 gory

No winner is SARU's half-cocked overseas policy

Keeping Coetzee sadly no April Fools' joke

Mediocrity must fall!

Overseas based SA players are no traitors!

Sick Boks need more than a new doctor

Joost earned more than a minute's silence 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
loading... Live
India 325/10 & 69/0
New Zealand 62/10
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 5542 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
7% - 936 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
20% - 2886 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
34% - 4724 votes