Shocking results, not race behind Coetzee's axing

Mark Keohane (File)
Mark Keohane (File)

Allister Coetzee’s firing has nothing to do with race and everything to do with results.

If his Springboks had a 65 percent-plus win ratio then there would be no discussion about Coetzee’s failing and pending firing.

Coetzee would have been lauded for his results, but the reality is that in the two seasons he has been in charge of the Springboks he has failed dismally. His results have not been good enough and he has also failed to deliver a transformed Springbok run-on XV.

Coetzee’s transformation record is as poor (and poorer) than his predecessors.

Professional sport is about results and Coetzee has not delivered those to his employers or the rugby public.

His first year in charge was abysmal and he survived because he cried foul of having a support staff forced on him, a lack of preparation time and whatever other external excuse he could find.

In 2017 he got the support staff he wanted; he got the training camps he wanted; he got all the external support he needed; he was given and afforded every opportunity to create an environment in which to succeed. His team failed the big Tests - and failed them big.

Coetzee’s letter to South African Rugby Union CEO Jurie Roux and the Executive, published on Sport24 over the weekend, is one sorry excuse after the other and shows absolute lack of accountability from Coetzee. His letter read like the transcripts of his press conferences post every embarrassing Springboks defeat over the past two years.

His belief that it is an insult for him to report to a national director of rugby (in Rassie Erasmus) is in itself an insult to Erasmus, who has done Coetzee no harm and has at no stage in the past two years aimed any public criticism at Coetzee.

At a time when past and present South African rugby coaches were swinging at Coetzee’s incompetency in selection, game strategy and results, Erasmus was absent in all critique.

He simply got on with his job as Munster director of rugby, in which he had assumed the head coaching job after Anthony Foley’s death.

Erasmus combined both roles and took Munster to a Champions Cup semi-final, where they lost to eventual winners Saracens and also the PRO12 final after topping the league table.

Erasmus’s record for Munster in the PRO12 is the most successful among Irish provinces in the history of the competition, eclipsing Irish coach Joe Schmidt’s overall winning percentage with Leinster.

Erasmus also won eight from 10 matches in the Champions Cup.

He has been coaching professionally since the age of 30 after injury ended a very successful Test career with the Springboks. Erasmus has all the credentials to head up rugby in South Africa. He has done his apprenticeship locally and abroad over the last 15 years and had success wherever he has gone.

Coetzee’s fight should be with those who employed him and not Erasmus.

What is obvious though is that Coetzee will not work with Erasmus and post his emotional and vitriolic rant to Roux (by a legally drafted letter) there is no way Erasmus will work with Coetzee. The relationship between Roux and Coetzee is also non-existent and the refusal of Coetzee to front any form of responsibility for having the worst Springbok coaching record (for coaches with 10-plus Tests) makes it impossible for him to continue in any capacity within South African rugby’s national structures.

Coetzee speaks of integrity and dignity but if that was at the heart of his motivation he would have settled on a dignified exit post the awful tour of Europe last November, which included a record 38-3 defeat against Ireland and also a second successive defeat against Wales in Cardiff.

Coetzee says it is not about the money but his rugby coaching reputation. It is all about the money because his rugby coaching reputation is in tatters following 11 wins from 25 Tests.

Coetzee will be fired this week because his win percentage is 44, he oversaw the first ever home defeat against Ireland, a record away defeat against Ireland, two successive defeats against Wales in Cardiff, the first ever away defeat against the Pumas in Argentina and the first ever defeat against Italy. He will be fired because he managed just one win against Australia in four Tests and none against the All Blacks in four Tests. He will be fired because in his first three Tests against the All Blacks his teams conceded 151 points and scored 28 and leaked 23 tries and scored one.

He will be fired - and rightly so - because of performance. It has nothing to do with culture, colour or his drink of choice.

The South African Rugby Union will in all probability cough up more than they should once the labour law legalities come into play, but every extra cent spent on getting him as far away from the Springboks in 2018 will be well spent.

This week’s announcement that Coetzee is out and Erasmus is in as Springbok coach can’t come soon enough.

Mark Keohane is a Cape-Town based award-winning rugby specialist and former Springbok Communications Manager. Follow him on Twitter

Sport24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on Sport24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Sport24.

Previous Mark Keohane columns on Sport24:

No tournament with Sunwolves can be 'best v best'!

How Rassie plans to re-align SA Rugby

Scrap the 30-Test ruling and make Cheslin Kolbe a Bok!

Blitzboks, not All Blacks, the talk of Cape Town

Kids don't win RWCs, get back Duane, Frans!

Why Rassie is the man to take Boks forward

Paris glory won't erase Albany and Dublin gore

I'd happily take a 1-point win!

To vote against SA's bid would be an insult

Bosch will win Currie Cup final for Sharks

No current Bok would make 2007 team!

Dublin is D-Day for Boks

All Blacks' lack of desire gives Boks a sniff

Boks will beat Wallabies, but...

Bok changes won't spell panic

Boks will run All Blacks close

Win or lose in Perth, Boks have made progress!

Etzebeth is the right choice for Bok captain!

Kriel sets example others should follow

Combrinck to lead Lions to Super Rugby title

Jantjies the man to lead Lions to glory

Stormers WILL reach Super Rugby semis!

Stormers need to back youngster Willemse

Serfontein, Mostert the Boks standouts

Boks must extend Brendan 'Mr Fixit' Venter's role

Coetzee's Lions-laden Bok side can't lose!

Expect a different looking Bok starting XV!

Fear not, Boks will whitewash France 3-0!

Hey Allister, load the Boks with Lions!

The RWC 2019 gods have smiled on the Boks!

Unleash Curwin Bosch on the French!

YES, an overseas-based SA team would beat the Boks, but...

The next Springbok skipper has to be...

Super Rugby cull good for SA rugby

Clap, clap ... Venter's appointment should be applauded

South African rugby NEEDS to host RWC 2023

Why SA can't have 6 Super Rugby teams

Super 12 glory is now Super 18 gory

No winner is SARU's half-cocked overseas policy

Keeping Coetzee sadly no April Fools' joke

Mediocrity must fall!

Overseas based SA players are no traitors!

Sick Boks need more than a new doctor

Joost earned more than a minute's silence

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
loading... Live
India 325/10 & 69/0
New Zealand 62/10
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 5542 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
7% - 936 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
20% - 2886 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
34% - 4724 votes