Rugby, soccer get thumbs up to resume training in Level 3, but no matches yet

accreditation
Nathi Mthethwa (Gallo)
Nathi Mthethwa (Gallo)

Professional rugby and soccer teams in South Africa can resume training under Level 3 of the national lockdown regulations starting on Monday, 1 June, but they will not be allowed to resume matches. 

That was the message from sports minister Nathi Mthethwa on Saturday as he confirmed that professional contact sport will be allowed to resume training in a staggered, controlled manner. 

Non-contact professional sports, meanwhile, have been given the green light to resume training and playing.

All professional sports teams and administrators who want to resume training or playing now have 14 days to submit their proposals to government to map out, procedurally, how they will ensure the safety of the players and officials involved. 

The ministry added that training and matches would not take place in hotspot areas. 

All sport will take place behind closed doors in empty stadiums and the control measures are strict with massages, ice-baths and saunas banned while physiotherapists will only be able to work on injured athletes.

"All sporting codes will be expected back at training," Mthethwa said.

"Our athletes have not been in training and we do not want to have them out of shape forever. The process of training will ensue for both contact and non-contact sport."

Mthethwa added that discussions with administrators from the football and rugby sectors were ongoing, while director general Vusumusi Mkhize said at the end of the briefing that Level 1 of the lockdown was a realistic prediction for when contact sports will return to play.

"We have a very good relationship with the sports bodies," said Mkhize.

"Yesterday (Friday) we had a meeting with the president of SAFA and doctors from SAFA and the PSL and they were very elaborate on their plans, which incorporate FIFA guidelines.

"In terms of rugby, doctors from the sporting fraternity after a lot of consultation with epidemiologists and various personnel from a scientific perspective and what it means for a return to play, they clearly outlined some of the core issues that they have.

"The various codes have been submitting to government individually from tennis, cricket, golf ... everyone has been submitting to us and that is what assisted us in crafting the directions that the minister has read."

- Compiled by Lloyd Burnard

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
loading... Live
India 325/10 & 69/0
New Zealand 62/10
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 5542 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
7% - 936 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
20% - 2886 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
34% - 4724 votes
Vote